2023
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311xpt151123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vigilância da morbidade materna no Brasil: contribuições para o debate

Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues,
Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias,
Valéria Saraceni
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…International literature had already been discussing this event, but in Brazil, scientific production was still in its first steps. Now, in 2023, CSP revisits this topic in an article 2 and an exchange of letters to the editors 3,4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…International literature had already been discussing this event, but in Brazil, scientific production was still in its first steps. Now, in 2023, CSP revisits this topic in an article 2 and an exchange of letters to the editors 3,4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors suggest a model based on the Brazilian Information System for Notificable Diseases (SINAN) or the use of data from the Hospital Information System of the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SIH/SUS). Two letters to the editors in response to the article discuss the strengths and the weaknesses of the proposal and bring new contributions to monitoring, extending it to severe maternal morbidity 3,4 . The adoption of a system similar to the Latin American Perinatal Information System (SIP; http://www.sipplus.org/), linked to the Latin American Center for Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health (CLAP/SMR; https://www.paho.org/en/clap), is perhaps the most appropriate proposal for the Brazilian reality, considering the national expertise in information systems 10 , the specificities of obstetric events, and the possibilities of joint analysis of data from countries in the region 11,12,13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%