2017
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00207416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update and extension of the Brazil SimSmoke model to estimate the health impact of cigarette smoking by pregnant women in Brazil

Abstract: Update and extension of the Brazil SimSmoke model to estimate the health impact of cigarette smoking by pregnant women in BrazilAtualização e extensão do modelo SimSmoke para estimar o impacto do tabagismo na saúde das gestantes brasileiras Actualización y extensión del modelo SimSmoke para estimar el impacto del tabaquismo en la salud de las gestantes brasileñas 1989, 7.5 million (6.4-8.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the findings of reduced smoking during pregnancy are in line with existing evidence 2. Reported smoking prevalence by pregnant women (5.9%) was lower than national estimates of adult smoking in Brazil (10.1%–15%)32 but quite comparable to other national survey estimates for smoking among pregnant women in 2008 (7.7%)33 and 2013 (4.7%) 34. There may be differences due to wealthier urban populations surveyed and potential for under-reporting bias through telephone interviewing, but the comparability of maternal smoking estimates suggest the findings are nationally representative 26…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the findings of reduced smoking during pregnancy are in line with existing evidence 2. Reported smoking prevalence by pregnant women (5.9%) was lower than national estimates of adult smoking in Brazil (10.1%–15%)32 but quite comparable to other national survey estimates for smoking among pregnant women in 2008 (7.7%)33 and 2013 (4.7%) 34. There may be differences due to wealthier urban populations surveyed and potential for under-reporting bias through telephone interviewing, but the comparability of maternal smoking estimates suggest the findings are nationally representative 26…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, model specifications account for trends over time— including gradual improvements in data quality—and there would have to be changes in data recording quality concurrent with the variable introduction of SFL to bias these results. Data limitations restricted other potentially relevant analyses (notably of preterm births as gestational age was recorded in categories until 201134) and further stratification by socioeconomic groups. Fourth, the averted deaths calculation used predicted mortality rates and rounded at the municipal level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the considerable decline in prevalence overall and among women (25.3% in 1989 to 11.2 in 2013) [16–18], the number of maternal-fetal deaths in this period was devastating. A study based on available data from population surveys estimated that between 1989 and 2015, smoking during pregnancy caused 410,065 deaths due to low birth weight, 358,821 due to prematurity, and 25,070 due to placenta previa or placental abruption [19]. The authors found that tobacco control policies saved 345,403 lives ascribed to such causes, however all of these deaths could have been avoided through smoking cessation before and during pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the strategy of raising cigarette taxes has reduced the prevalence of smoking and the consumption of licit cigarettes in Brazil. 1 However, a certain fraction of smokers may have migrated to cheaper, illicit cigarettes in order to save money. 2 In many low- and middle-income countries, the tobacco industry is the only source of information on the illicit cigarette market, and this information can be used in order to weaken or delay the implementation of effective tobacco control policies.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%