2016
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00194316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impactos do novo regime fiscal na saúde e educação

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
33

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
24
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…The Amendment was approved in 2016 and warns that it will not bring economic growth and will substantially reduce investments in public health and education in the country. 28 Economic simulations show that, with the freezing of public spending, the 4% of GDP in 2015 for health and education will drastically decrease to 2.7% in 20 years of the new fiscal regime, a time where the Brazilian population will grow by up to 10%. It is thus stated that the Amendment precludes any improvements in these two social areas and creates a loophole for scrapping and extinction of universality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Amendment was approved in 2016 and warns that it will not bring economic growth and will substantially reduce investments in public health and education in the country. 28 Economic simulations show that, with the freezing of public spending, the 4% of GDP in 2015 for health and education will drastically decrease to 2.7% in 20 years of the new fiscal regime, a time where the Brazilian population will grow by up to 10%. It is thus stated that the Amendment precludes any improvements in these two social areas and creates a loophole for scrapping and extinction of universality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus stated that the Amendment precludes any improvements in these two social areas and creates a loophole for scrapping and extinction of universality. 28 J Nurs UFPE on line. 2019;13:e240388 https://doi.org/10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One plausible explanation is that individuals were unable to di erentiate the e ect of political corruption from those of spending cuts. Due to the severe economic crisis in 2014-2016, the Brazilian federal government introduced discretionary spending limits that a ected public investment (Rossi and Dweck 2016). Politicians may argue that delays in school constructions are not derived from their misuse of government funds but from the austerity measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De fato, não parece haver razão para não aceitar o senso comum: mesmo que disponibilizados em quantidade suficiente, recursos utilizados de forma inadequada ou não utilizados não implicarão condições de ensino adequadas e, possivelmente, não estarão associados a melhorias da aprendizagem dos alunos. Ainda que a disponibilidade de quantidade adequada de recursos não represente o caso das escolas no Brasil (PINTO, 2002;ABRAHÃO, 2005;DAVIES, 2012;NETO et al, 2013;ROSSI;DWECK, 2016) e que "utilização adequada/inadequada de recursos" necessite de definição, parece certo que a adequada ou inadequada utilização dos recursos só se revela quando são conhecidos os gastos de escolas e não os gastos agregados de redes de ensino: Além disso, se é importante conhecer a utilização dos recursos, a informação de gastos das escolas não pode se restringir a classificações que apontem para os insumos disponíveis, mas deve estar associada às atividades ou funções desempenhadas pelas escolas. Isto é, se o objetivo é explorar a utilização dos recursos, o conhecimento dos gastos com coordenação pedagógica ou com aulas de reforço possivelmente tem mais a oferecer que a informação de despesas com material de consumo ou material permanente (PICUS; PETERNICK, 1998, p. 109).…”
Section: Gastos Com Educação E Desempenho Emunclassified