Por uma estratégia equitativa de vacinação da população privada de liberdade contra a COVID-19

Simas, Luciana; Larouzé, Bernard; Diuana, Vilma; Sánchez, Alexandra

doi:10.1590/0102-311x00068221

Cited by 7 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Three had a global focus; 71,73,74 four focused solely on Europe; 12,75-77 and two presented comparative accounts, one between the UK, US, and Europe, 78 and one between the US and Brazil. 79…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our review discovered that only a minority of countries have prioritised people who live and work in prisons for vaccination. 71,75,77,79 Many countries have not explicitly prioritised these individuals as part of their vaccine rollout, even though some unambiguously recognised the vulnerability of the prison population in official publications. 71,75,77 Such inconsistencies are irrational, unethical and discriminatory, and perpetuate the marginalisation and social exclusion that many imprisoned people experienced prior to and during their incarceration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three had a global focus; 71,73,74 four focused solely on Europe; 12,[75][76][77] and two presented comparative accounts, one between the UK, US, and Europe, 78 and one between the US and Brazil. 79 The majority of empirical studies were judged to be of good quality (see Appendix 3).…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These include Brazil, Kenya, Morocco, Nepal, and South Africa. 71,77,79 Moreover, a third of EU Member States, namely Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Portugal, Romania, and Spain have acknowledged people in prisons as a priority group in their national vaccination strategies. 75,77 A small number of countries, notably Ireland and Luxembourg, recognise the vulnerable environment in which their incarcerated population is placed, given the lack of ability to self-isolate and social distance.…”

Section: The Extent To Which People Who Live and Work In Prisons Are ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review

Ismail

Tavoschi

Moazen

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Overcrowding, poor conditions, and high population turnover make prisons highly susceptible to COVID-19. Vaccination is key to controlling COVID-19, yet there is disagreement regarding whether people who live and work in prisons should be prioritised in national vaccination programmes. To help resolve this, we critically examine the extent, nature, and quality of extant literature regarding prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccinations for people who live and work in prisons. Using a scoping review as our methodological framework, we conducted a systematic literature search of 17 databases. From 2,307 potentially eligible articles, we removed duplicates and screened titles and abstracts to retain 45 articles for review and quality appraisal. Findings indicated that while most countries recognise that prisons are at risk of high levels of COVID-19 transmission, only a minority have explicitly prioritised people who live and work in prisons for COVID-19 vaccination. Even among those that have, prioritisation criteria varies considerably. This is set against a backdrop of political barriers, such as politicians questioning the moral deservingness of people in prison; policy barriers, such as the absence of a unified international framework of how vaccine prioritisation should proceed in prisons; logistical barriers regarding vaccine administration in prisons; and behavioural barriers including vaccine hesitancy. We outline five strategies to prioritise people who live and work in prisons in COVID-19 vaccination plans: (1) improving data collection on COVID-19 vaccination, (2) reducing the number of people imprisoned, (3) tackling vaccine populism through advocacy, (4) challenging arbitrary prioritisation processes via legal processes, and (5) conducting more empirical research on COVID-19 vaccination planning, delivery, and acceptability. Implementing these strategies would help to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on the prison population, prevent community transmission, improve vaccine uptake in prisons beyond the current pandemic, foster political accountability, and inform future decision-making.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Extent To Which People Who Live and Work In Prisons Are ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review

Ismail

Tavoschi

Moazen

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review

Ismail

Tavoschi²,

Moazen³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Overcrowding, poor conditions, and high population turnover make prisons highly susceptible to COVID-19. Vaccination is key to controlling COVID-19, yet there is disagreement regarding whether people who live and work in prisons should be prioritised in national vaccination programmes. To help resolve this, we critically examine the extent, nature, and quality of extant literature regarding prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccinations for people who live and work in prisons. Using a scoping review as our methodological framework, we conducted a systematic literature search of 17 databases. From 2,307 potentially eligible articles, we removed duplicates and screened titles and abstracts to retain 45 articles for review and quality appraisal. Findings indicated that while most countries recognise that prisons are at risk of high levels of COVID-19 transmission, only a minority have explicitly prioritised people who live and work in prisons for COVID-19 vaccination. Even among those that have, prioritisation criteria vary considerably. This is set against a backdrop of political barriers, such as politicians questioning the moral deservingness of people in prison; policy barriers, such as the absence of a unified international framework of how vaccine prioritisation should proceed in prisons; logistical barriers regarding vaccine administration in prisons; and behavioural barriers including vaccine hesitancy. We outline five strategies to prioritise people who live and work in prisons in COVID-19 vaccination plans: (1) improving data collection on COVID-19 vaccination, (2) reducing the number of people imprisoned, (3) tackling vaccine populism through advocacy, (4) challenging arbitrary prioritisation processes via legal processes, and (5) conducting more empirical research on COVID-19 vaccination planning, delivery, and acceptability. Implementing these strategies would help to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on the prison population, prevent community transmission, improve vaccine uptake in prisons beyond the current pandemic, foster political accountability, and inform future decision-making.

show abstract

COVID-19 nas prisões: o que o telejornalismo (não) mostrou - um estudo sobre os critérios de noticiabilidade na pandemia

Diuana

Constantino

et al. 2022

Ciênc. saúde coletiva

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo Para analisar a cobertura telejornalística da pandemia de COVID-19 nas prisões brasileiras e sua visibilidade, foram examinadas 213 matérias veiculadas entre março e dezembro de 2020, encontradas no serviço de buscas da plataforma digital de vídeos por streaming Globoplay. A maior parte foi ao ar em março, abril e julho, com importante redução nos meses subsequentes. As reportagens, sobre números de mortes ou infectados, medidas de prevenção e prisão domiciliar ou liberdade para grupos de risco da COVID-19, foram divulgadas principalmente nos jornais locais. Os órgãos de saúde quase não foram ouvidos. Das 19 notícias apresentadas nacionalmente, 12 abordam os “presos famosos” e a legitimidade da prisão domiciliar ou a liberdade para grupos de risco da COVID-19. As pautas sanitárias e de garantia do direito à saúde das pessoas privadas de liberdade ficaram limitadas às dificuldades para a efetivação nos presídios das medidas de proteção e a sustentar a necessidade de medidas restritivas à movimentação no interior das prisões e nos intercâmbios com o exterior para limitar a circulação do vírus. Em geral, a forma e a visibilidade dadas ao tema não contribuem para ampliar a percepção dos telespectadores sobre as condições sanitárias das prisões e o fato de que a saúde é um direito de todos, sem qualquer distinção.

show abstract

Por uma estratégia equitativa de vacinação da população privada de liberdade contra a COVID-19

Cited by 7 publications

References 3 publications

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review

COVID-19 vaccine for people who live and work in prisons worldwide: A scoping review

COVID-19 nas prisões: o que o telejornalismo (não) mostrou - um estudo sobre os critérios de noticiabilidade na pandemia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About