2017
DOI: 10.1590/0101-7438.2017.037.01.0067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting Working Teams for Information Technology Outsourcing Projects Through a Combination of Methodologies

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This paper deals with a problem that Information Technology outsourcing suppliers generally face when selecting a working team technically capable for specific roles in software development projects. A combination of methodologies, interactively integrated, is proposed. They are Soft System Methodology to structure the problem, Repertory Grid for individual interviews and elicitation of the selection criteria, DRV Processes to assess the candidates and to generate knowledge and consensus on the selec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence in the OR literature that MM and MP have been applied in several organizational contexts (Mingers (, ), Mingers (), Mingers (), Mingers and Munro (). It is interesting to note that this practice not only circumscribes to large companies but has begun to filter into the contexts of small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) (Paucar‐Caceres et al ., ; Castellini et al ., ; Pontelli et al ., ; Castellini ; Silva Barros et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence in the OR literature that MM and MP have been applied in several organizational contexts (Mingers (, ), Mingers (), Mingers (), Mingers and Munro (). It is interesting to note that this practice not only circumscribes to large companies but has begun to filter into the contexts of small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) (Paucar‐Caceres et al ., ; Castellini et al ., ; Pontelli et al ., ; Castellini ; Silva Barros et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%