2016
DOI: 10.1590/0101-7438.2016.036.03.0447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model-Based Heuristic for the Irregular Strip Packing Problem

Abstract: The irregular strip packing problem is a common variant of cutting and packing problems. Only a few exact methods have been proposed to solve this problem in the literature. However, several heuristics have been proposed to solve it. Despite the number of proposed heuristics, only a few methods that combine exact and heuristic approaches to solve the problem can be found in the literature. In this paper, a matheuristic is proposed to solve the irregular strip packing problem. The method has three phases in whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic NFP-CM-VS model is defined by the objective function (17) and the constraints (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), whilst the full NFP-CM-VS model is defined by the former objective function and the constraints, symmetry breakings, valid inequalities, and variable eliminations in expressions . The objective function (17) together with the constraints (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) fit the definition of the basic NFP-CM model without cuts [25], with the only exception of our two distinguished binary variables and encoding the left and right feasible sub-regions shown in figure 5, whilst the constraints (24-29) encode our new convex decomposition based on vertical slices, which removes all symmetric solutions derived from any relative placement between pieces.…”
Section: The Nfp-cm-vs Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic NFP-CM-VS model is defined by the objective function (17) and the constraints (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), whilst the full NFP-CM-VS model is defined by the former objective function and the constraints, symmetry breakings, valid inequalities, and variable eliminations in expressions . The objective function (17) together with the constraints (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) fit the definition of the basic NFP-CM model without cuts [25], with the only exception of our two distinguished binary variables and encoding the left and right feasible sub-regions shown in figure 5, whilst the constraints (24-29) encode our new convex decomposition based on vertical slices, which removes all symmetric solutions derived from any relative placement between pieces.…”
Section: The Nfp-cm-vs Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another model based on CLP was presented by [11]. The researchers reported constraints aiming to ensure all feasibility requirements to achieve a solution.…”
Section: Approaches To Tackle Irregular Strip Packing Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, we cut the stock into a triangular shape. Cherri et al (2016) explained that in the 3-Phase Matheuristic model, there were 3 phases including a constructive phase which is useful to get an initial solution, an improvement phase to improve the initial solution and a compaction phase to increase the initial solution to best solution. The 3-Phase Matheuristic model has 2 models namely the Dotted Board model that has been described by Gomes and Oliveira (2006) and the Mixed Integer Linear model that has been described by Toledo et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%