2019
DOI: 10.1590/0101-60830000000183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary study of the Thai-version of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS-Thai): content validity, known-group validity, and internal consistency reliability

Abstract: Objective: To assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS-Thai). Methods: Content validity was evaluated by four psychiatrists who rated the SAPS-Thai, and the content validity indexes (CVI) were also analyzed. Known-group validity was assessed by comparing the SAPS-Thai score among thirty outpatients and ten inpatients with schizophrenia. Internal consistency was calculated using the Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Results: SAPS-Thai has exce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. [12][13][14][15] Subsequently, the Eyes test was administered by independent research assistants. All participants gave written inform consent, and the study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Thammasat University (MTU-EC-ES-6-043/59).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. [12][13][14][15] Subsequently, the Eyes test was administered by independent research assistants. All participants gave written inform consent, and the study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Thammasat University (MTU-EC-ES-6-043/59).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) were administered to the patients to assess the severity of their positive symptoms. The total SAPS scores were between 0 and 150, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity (Andreasen, 1984b;Charernboon, 2019a).…”
Section: Positive Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Faces test consists of 20 pictures of human faces showing a variety of emotions. The scores ranged from 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating better emotion recognition performance (Charernboon, 2017).…”
Section: Emotion Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive symptoms were measured using the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). 13 , 14 Positive symptoms were presented as a single unitary construct using the sum of global ratings. The global ratings range from 0 to 20 with the higher score indicating more severe positive symptoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%