2020
DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerated rehabilitation versus conventional rehabilitation in total hip arthroplasty (ARTHA): a randomized double blinded clinical trial

Abstract: Objectives: compare an accelerated physiotherapeutic protocol to a conventional physiotherapeutic protocol in total hip arthroplasty patients. Methods: a randomized double blinded clinical trial performed from August 2013 to November 2014. Forty-eight patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis submitted to a total hip arthroplasty surgery. An accelerated rehabilitation physiotherapy applied three times a day and start gait training on the first day or standard physiotherapy applied once a day and start gait… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, we used a controlled group to assess the outcomes of two kinds of hip arthroplasty, THA and HA, on patients with femoral neck fracture. The findings indicated that the THA group had substantially greater operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and total drainage than the HA group, indicating that THA is more stressful and detrimental to patients than HA, as previous research [20] has shown. The results showed that at the 6-month postoperative time point, patients in the HA group had significantly higher hip Harris scores than those in the THA group, and there was no difference in the Harris scores at the 1-year and 2-year postoperative time points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In this research, we used a controlled group to assess the outcomes of two kinds of hip arthroplasty, THA and HA, on patients with femoral neck fracture. The findings indicated that the THA group had substantially greater operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and total drainage than the HA group, indicating that THA is more stressful and detrimental to patients than HA, as previous research [20] has shown. The results showed that at the 6-month postoperative time point, patients in the HA group had significantly higher hip Harris scores than those in the THA group, and there was no difference in the Harris scores at the 1-year and 2-year postoperative time points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Of these studies, 14 studies 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 retrospectively compared the ERAS pathway with historical or standard controls, and eight 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 prospectively described ERAS pathways with associated controls. The remaining two 35 , 36 studies were conducted as RCTs. Details are shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 47 , 48 A total of 41.7% (10/24) of the studies highlighted the importance of perioperative surgical factors in their ERAS protocols. Sixty percent (6/10) of studies 13 , 14 , 16 , 33 , 35 , 36 reported the use of specific surgical approaches; 50% (4/8) of studies 13 , 20 , 30 , 36 with knee replacement highlighted the reduced or abandoned use of tourniquets; and 60% (6/10) of studies 13 , 14 , 18 , 20 , 22 , 36 did not support the routine use of drains. Furthermore, only two studies 13 , 36 supported the use of specific surgical approaches and reduced or abandoned the use of tourniquets and drains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a postoperative complication occurs, recovery length may increase up to 10 days [ 7 ]. As soon as the patient is stable in regard to general status, and pain is controlled, he or she can be discharged to a rehabilitation ward or facility [ 8 , 9 ]. Alternatively, if functional status is definitely good, the rehabilitation protocol can be continued with supervised exercises either at patient’s home or as an outpatient [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%