2018
DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2018.51.3e3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of dynamic contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to the diagnosis of malignant cervical lymph nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Benign nodes in our patient population may therefore have different diffusion characteristics to normal or reactive nodes in the general population without elevated EBV levels. To note, a few prior studies have reported lower mean ADC values in benign compared with malignant nodes [44][45][46][47], and Cintra et al [47] speculated that the underlying pathological cause of benign nodes influences their diffusion values. Moreover, it is well established that diffusion parameters of malignant nodes may also vary according to the underlying pathology, with significant differences found amongst malignant nodes for NPC, SCC and lymphoma [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benign nodes in our patient population may therefore have different diffusion characteristics to normal or reactive nodes in the general population without elevated EBV levels. To note, a few prior studies have reported lower mean ADC values in benign compared with malignant nodes [44][45][46][47], and Cintra et al [47] speculated that the underlying pathological cause of benign nodes influences their diffusion values. Moreover, it is well established that diffusion parameters of malignant nodes may also vary according to the underlying pathology, with significant differences found amongst malignant nodes for NPC, SCC and lymphoma [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging techniques have increased the importance of imaging studies in the evaluation of diseases that affect the head and neck ( 5 - 10 ) . Although CT scans are used routinely in anatomical evaluations of the paranasal sinuses, a recent study showed that 75% of radiological reports add little value in terms of informing therapeutic decisions ( 1 , 11 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%