Epidemiological and imaging features that can affect the detection of ureterolithiasis on ultrasound

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify, in patients with clinical suspicion of ureterolithiasis, epidemiological and imaging features that affect calculus detection on ultrasound, as well as to compare ultrasound with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).Materials and MethodsWe searched our database for patients who underwent ultrasound, followed by MDCT (if the ultrasound was negative), for suspected ureterolithiasis in an emergency setting. Patients were divided into three groups: positive ultrasound (US+); negative ultrasound/positive MDCT (US−/MDCT+); and negative ultrasound/negative MDCT (US−/MDCT−). We evaluated age, gender, ureterolithiasis laterality, location of the calculus within the ureter, body mass index, calculus diameter, and calculus attenuation on MDCT.ResultsOf a total of 292 cases of suspected ureterolithiasis, 155 (53.1%) were in the US+ group, 46 (15.7%) were in the US−/MDCT+ group, and 91 (31.2%) were in the US−/MDCT− group. There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of age, gender, ureterolithiasis laterality, and mean MDCT attenuation values. Distal ureterolithiasis was most common in the US+ group, and calculi at other ureteral locations were more common in the US−/MDCT+ group. The mean body mass index was significantly higher in the US−/MDCT+ group than in the US+ group, and the mean calculus diameter was significantly greater in the US+ group than in the US−/MDCT+ group.ConclusionA high body mass index, large calculus diameter, and calculus location in the distal third of the ureter are the major factors favoring ureterolithiasis detection on ultrasound.

Percutaneous nephrostomy versus antegrade double-J stent placement in the treatment of malignant obstructive uropathy: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Brazilian public health care system

“…The evaluation of urinary tract obstruction and ureterolithiasis by imaging methods has been the subject of a series of recent publications in the radiology literature of Brazil (15)(16)(17)(18) . The present study provides evidence of the value of applying methods of cost-effectiveness analysis to interventional radiology.…”

<p>Prevalence of Urolithiasis by Ultrasonography Among Patients with Gout: A Cross-Sectional Study from the UP-Philippine General Hospital</p>

“…44 Furthermore, increase in patient abdominal body mass, relative calculi size, and certain locations of stone lodgment have been demonstrated to contribute to the risk of false-negative findings on ultrasound. 45 Studies that compare this modality head-on with the recognized gold standard for imaging urolithiasis, computed tomography (CT), give a pooled estimate of its sensitivity and specificity at only 70.2% (95% CI=67.1-73.2%) and 75.4% (95% CI=72.5-78.2%) respectively, which are improved by certain clinical and anatomic factors. 46 On the other hand, the first-line choice for imaging, particularly given the specific clinical context covered by the present study, is still contentious.…”

Twist and shout: magnetic resonance imaging findings in ovarian torsion

“…The differential diagnosis of ovarian torsion includes appendicitis, diverticulitis, renal colic, pelvic inflammatory disease, corpus luteum cyst, and endometriosis (2,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) . The definitive diagnosis is made on the basis of laparoscopic findings (8) .…”