2016
DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body

Abstract: ObjectiveTo identify the computed tomography findings suggestive of intestinal perforation by an ingested foreign body.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective study of four cases of surgically proven intestinal perforation by a foreign body, comparing the computed tomography findings with those described in the literature.ResultsNone of the patients reported having ingested a foreign body, all were over 60 years of age, three of the four patients used a dental prosthesis, and all of the foreign bodies we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of perforation is often subclinical and not detected on routine imaging. [15,17] Postoperatively, our patient had appropriate return of bowel function. She was unaware of how the sheet of plastic was ingested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of perforation is often subclinical and not detected on routine imaging. [15,17] Postoperatively, our patient had appropriate return of bowel function. She was unaware of how the sheet of plastic was ingested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These perforations are usually caused by long, elongated, or sharp objects. [15,16] Although intestinal perforation can also be caused due to impaction which subsequently leads to bowel ischemia. This type of perforation is often subclinical and not detected on routine imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from the point of view of clinical practice, the medical history, signs, and symptoms of digestive tract perforation are often atypical, which causes difficulties in clinical diagnosis and delays the opportunity for treatment. 4 The patient's condition was aggravated because the local hospital failed to accurately diagnose and identify the indication for operation in the early stage of the disease, which increased the difficulty of the operation and the risk of complications. After completing the necessary examinations and identifying the surgical indications, the patient underwent emergency subtotal gastrectomy, gastro-jejunal R-Y anastomosis, and abdominal lavage and drainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objects that can cause perforations are often long, hard and sharp most commonly fish bones, chicken bones, toothpicks and skewers. The risk of perforation is dependent on the nature and site of foreign body with thin, sharp or pointed objects having up to 35% perforation rates that mainly occurs in the small intestines due to many points of physiological angulations . Intestinal perforation due to blunt foreign bodies is rare, and rarer for a common dietary food to cause such perforation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%