2015
DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readjustment of abdominal computed tomography protocols in a university hospital: impact on radiation dose

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess the reduction of estimated radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography following the implementation of new scan protocols on the basis of clinical suspicion and of adjusted images acquisition parameters.Materials and MethodsRetrospective and prospective review of reports on radiation dose from abdominal CT scans performed three months before (group A – 551 studies) and three months after (group B – 788 studies) implementation of new scan protocols proposed as a function of clinical indic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At our institution, reducing the radiation dose is a major goal, the health care professionals are continuously informed about the radiation risks, as well as the need for a more conscientious use of radiological procedures, and protocols are constantly being changed in order to achieve that goal. Recent changes in the adult abdominal CT protocols at our institution-modifications in technical aspects of the examinations and in the number of acquisition phases-have reduced the median level of radiation exposure by half ( 45 ) , benefiting not only the patients, who are exposed to a lower radiation dose, but also the institution, because the scans have become faster and consequently less expensive ( 46 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At our institution, reducing the radiation dose is a major goal, the health care professionals are continuously informed about the radiation risks, as well as the need for a more conscientious use of radiological procedures, and protocols are constantly being changed in order to achieve that goal. Recent changes in the adult abdominal CT protocols at our institution-modifications in technical aspects of the examinations and in the number of acquisition phases-have reduced the median level of radiation exposure by half ( 45 ) , benefiting not only the patients, who are exposed to a lower radiation dose, but also the institution, because the scans have become faster and consequently less expensive ( 46 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various strategies for reducing radiation doses in abdominal scans, limiting the number of phases in CT scans has proven to be one of the most effective (12,13). Recent studies have demonstrated that it is possible to eliminate one or more phases during a CT scan in a range of clinical settings without significant impact on diagnostic accuracy (12)(13)(14). To the best of our knowledge, this hypothesis has not yet been specifically tested for CT examinations in patients with APN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of CT consists in exposing the patient to high doses of ionizing radiation when considering a standard protocol (8), especially when there is a need for repeat CT examinations (9). Among the various strategies for reducing radiation doses in abdominal scans, limiting the number of phases in CT scans has proven to be one of the most effective (12,13). Recent studies have demonstrated that it is possible to eliminate one or more phases during a CT scan in a range of clinical settings without significant impact on diagnostic accuracy (12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of professionals from various areas, without specific training in the field of radiation protection, can lead to excessive exposure to ionizing radiation in the operating room ( 2 , 3 ) . Previous studies have indicated that nonradiologist physicians possess heterogeneous, inadequate knowledge of ionizing radiation, suggesting that there is room for improvement ( 4 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%