2020
DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760200504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing ambiguities in trypanosomatids taxonomy by barcoding

Abstract: BACKGROUND Biodiversity screens and phylogenetic studies are dependent on reliable DNA sequences in public databases. Biological collections possess vouchered specimens with a traceable history. Therefore, DNA sequencing of samples available at institutional collections can greatly contribute to taxonomy, and studies on evolution and biodiversity. METHODS We sequenced part of the glycosomal glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (gGAPDH) and the SSU rRNA (V7/ V8) genes from 102 trypanosomatid cultures, which a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is further supported by the first detection of Crithidia acanthocephali Hanson and McGhee, 1961 in bumblebees, a protozoan that was recently found to be rather frequent in Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 colonies following the same Ion PGM protocol (Bartolomé et al ., 2020). A revision of taxonomic ambiguities by DNA barcoding (Boucinha et al ., 2020) proved that the sequences of this trypanosomatid were identical to those of Crithidia flexonema Wallace, Clark, Dyer and Collins 1960, so from now on both names are used for this taxon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This is further supported by the first detection of Crithidia acanthocephali Hanson and McGhee, 1961 in bumblebees, a protozoan that was recently found to be rather frequent in Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758 colonies following the same Ion PGM protocol (Bartolomé et al ., 2020). A revision of taxonomic ambiguities by DNA barcoding (Boucinha et al ., 2020) proved that the sequences of this trypanosomatid were identical to those of Crithidia flexonema Wallace, Clark, Dyer and Collins 1960, so from now on both names are used for this taxon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Following the "one host-one parasite" paradigm that governed the classification of trypanosomatids for many years, these were both considered as different species. However, a recent taxonomic revision based on DNA barcoding [9] showed the sequences of both these species to be identical, leading to the proposal to unify the nomenclature under the name of the first chronological described species, C. flexonema. However, to the best of our knowledge there has been no consensus on this proposal and most of the bibliography consulted refers to C. acanthocephali.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crithidia acanthocephali is quite widespread geographically [9], and as previous works have proved, it can proliferate inside insects from different orders, such as Diptera, Coleoptera, or Orthoptera, increasing their mortality [10,11]. Although to date there is little information available regarding this trypanosomatid in honey bees, a recent study detected C. acanthocephali for the first time in honey bee colonies in the center of Spain via Ion PGM sequencing, along with other species commonly found in honey bee colonies (e.g., Lotmaria passim and Crithidia mellificae) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%