2016
DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging infectious disease and fast-track publication: when public health gets priority over the formality of scholarly publishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The added-value of text mining full text articles instead of abstracts has been illustrated before by Westergaard et al [48]. However, a recent estimation of Open Access publishing showed that only 28 percent of scientific articles are published Open Access [49]. Thus, the limitation of mining only title and abstracts is not expected to be eliminated any time soon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The added-value of text mining full text articles instead of abstracts has been illustrated before by Westergaard et al [48]. However, a recent estimation of Open Access publishing showed that only 28 percent of scientific articles are published Open Access [49]. Thus, the limitation of mining only title and abstracts is not expected to be eliminated any time soon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um exemplo de fast track no período de emergência em Zika no Brasil foi o utilizado pelo periódico Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, editado pela Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. O Memórias de Oswaldo Cruz criou uma seção chamada "Zika Fast Track", onde foram publicados manuscritos de pesquisa relevantes para a epidemia do Zika (PIRMEZ, 2016).…”
Section: Ross-hellauer T What Is Open Peer Review?unclassified
“…The emerging nature of the outbreak, the seriousness of the disease, and the global public interest on the topic all demanded accurate information to mitigate the spread of the virus and to effectively treat those affected. Driven by the urgency to respond to Zika, funding agencies made resources available to researchers [2,3] and scientific journals attempted to accelerate science communication by opening up fast track papers (accelerating editorial decisions, peer review and publication) [4][5][6], providing room for other document types such as editorials, news and social media, as well as making the research freely available through open access publishing [7,8]. The result was nearly a 3,000 percent increase in papers with "Zika" in the title since the beginning of 2016, as seen on the Scopus database [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%