2016
DOI: 10.1590/0047-2085000000098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faux Pas Test in schizophrenic patients

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study is to validate the adult version of “Faux Pas Recognition Test” created by Stone and colleagues (1998) as a reliable instrument assess and discriminate social cognition among schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Methods This is a cross-sectional study with a total of 196 participants (mean age = 26.45; CI (95%) [25.10; 27.83]) 51% male. From those, 44 (22.4%) patients with schizophrenia and 152 (77.6%) healthy controls. The participants answered a short version of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not a test that specifically and comprehensively assesses domains of ToM and EP. The work by Negrão et al 44 adapted and validated the "Faux Pas Recognition Test" 45 , considered a test that assesses ToM, initially used to assess this domain in patients with frontal lobe lesions. This test has not been evaluated in the work by Pinkham et al, and thus, we cannot infer its employability as a measure that relates to functional performance in schizophrenia, for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not a test that specifically and comprehensively assesses domains of ToM and EP. The work by Negrão et al 44 adapted and validated the "Faux Pas Recognition Test" 45 , considered a test that assesses ToM, initially used to assess this domain in patients with frontal lobe lesions. This test has not been evaluated in the work by Pinkham et al, and thus, we cannot infer its employability as a measure that relates to functional performance in schizophrenia, for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%