2013
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-1394-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of hantavirus and Yersinia pestis antibodies in professionals from the Plague Control Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A seroprevalence survey showed hantavirus and Yersinia pestis antibodies in professionals working with rodents in the field and in the laboratory (Costa et al, 2013). This result highlights the importance of protective measures for these professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A seroprevalence survey showed hantavirus and Yersinia pestis antibodies in professionals working with rodents in the field and in the laboratory (Costa et al, 2013). This result highlights the importance of protective measures for these professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In a study by Costa et al 22 with serum samples from professionals working in the handling of rodents for research Yersinia pestis, in the field or in the laboratory, were tested for hantavirus was identified and tested negative in Pernambuco professionals. This study by Hinrichsen et al 21 and the survey in Garanhuns represent important investigative data for Pernambuco, indicating hantavirus circulating even in areas without clinical cases reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A serological survey has revealed the presence of antibodies against plague and hantavirus among healthcare professionals working in zoonosis control programs. However, they had no previous symptoms or clinical signs of plague 4 . It is advisable to populations in at-risk areas to be aware of events suggestive of plague, such as the occurrence of epizootics of rodents without apparent cause.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%