2016
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0275-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors associated with non-adherence to the treatment of vivax malaria in a rural community from the Brazilian Amazon Basin

Abstract: Introduction:We investigated the association between demographic and behavioral factors and non-adherence to antimalarial therapy. Methods: A demographic questionnaire and 5-item self-reported questionnaire regarding non-adherence were completed by 135 patients after treatment for Plasmodium vivax. Results: Treatment interruption, but not demographic factors, was significantly associated with non-adherence to therapy. The likelihood of non-adherence was 5.16 times higher when the patients felt better than when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that there was no signi cant relationship between patients demographics and their compliance with antimalarial drugs treatment and that was consistent with the ndings of a study carried out in Uganda [28]. Stopping treatment after symptoms improvement [29] and upon the development of ADRs [30] was shown in some studies and it was found that drug knowledge and previous experience of drug use were signi cant predictors of adherence to treatment [31]. Patient education on noncompliance to treatment and its drawbacks not only for the patients but also for the whole country as a risk of drug resistance is very crucial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results showed that there was no signi cant relationship between patients demographics and their compliance with antimalarial drugs treatment and that was consistent with the ndings of a study carried out in Uganda [28]. Stopping treatment after symptoms improvement [29] and upon the development of ADRs [30] was shown in some studies and it was found that drug knowledge and previous experience of drug use were signi cant predictors of adherence to treatment [31]. Patient education on noncompliance to treatment and its drawbacks not only for the patients but also for the whole country as a risk of drug resistance is very crucial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In Pará, Brazil, the relative risk of parasitic resurgence was 3.04 times higher in non-adherent patients (19). Other study reported that adherence frequency was 86.4% (81.7%-90.1%) (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the Brazilian Amazon region, treatment is not supervised and there are few studies that discuss the importance of adherence and the often-precarious conditions of dispensing and storing medications can contribute negatively [ 19 ]. In the state of Pará, Brazil, one study reported that the relative risk of parasitic resurgence was 3.04 times higher in patients that did not adequately adhere to treatment, and also reported that adherence frequency was 86.4% (81.7%–90.1%) [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%