2013
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0127-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of an in-house nested-PCR technique for pleural tuberculosis diagnoses

Abstract: Introduction: This study evaluated the performance of an in-house nested-PCR system for the detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in pleural fl uid, blood and urine samples from pleural effusion tuberculosis patients by health services physicians in Pernambuco, Brazil. Methods: A prospective double-blind study with 37 hospitalized patients of both sexes, aged over 15, was used to investigate the diagnosis of pleural effusion. The criteria used to defi ne the cases included the demonstration of ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PCR in HIV-positive and -negative patients with PTB were 35%, 76.5%, 26.8%, and 73.2%, respectively. In a study on pleural effusion, Montenegro et al (20) observed sensitivities of 84.2%, 72.2%, and 33.3%, respectively, when nested PCR was applied to (i) pleural fluid, blood, and/or urine samples; (ii) blood and/or urine samples without pleural fluid samples; and (iii) pleural fluid samples alone. They concluded that the sensitivity of the test could be improved by the use of different samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PCR in HIV-positive and -negative patients with PTB were 35%, 76.5%, 26.8%, and 73.2%, respectively. In a study on pleural effusion, Montenegro et al (20) observed sensitivities of 84.2%, 72.2%, and 33.3%, respectively, when nested PCR was applied to (i) pleural fluid, blood, and/or urine samples; (ii) blood and/or urine samples without pleural fluid samples; and (iii) pleural fluid samples alone. They concluded that the sensitivity of the test could be improved by the use of different samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%