2020
DOI: 10.1590/0034-761220190345x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policies, Children, and Road Safety: contributions from the WPR approach to policy analysis

Abstract: Resumo: Consideramos a atenção pública voltada à segurança da criança no trânsito tendo por base a abordagem, de inspiração foucaultiana, What’s the Problem Represented to Be?, (WPR) de Carol Bacchi. A premissa, neste estudo, reside em utilizar textos de políticas e propostas de políticas visando acessar problematizações por meio das quais somos governados. Seu potencial é relevante para que repensemos ênfases convencionais na definição de agenda e em processos de elaboração de políticas. A WPR sugere que, na … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacchi's (2009) method of “What is the problem represented to be?” (WPR) has been used for the critical analysis of policies in Indonesia. The WPR approach has been used for various social policy analyses, including for children's and adolescent policies (see, for example, Bills & Howard, 2017; Cordeiro & Mello, 2020; Komai, 2021; Skovhus & Thomsen, 2017; Tawell & Mccluskey, 2021; Wismayanti et al., 2021). This approach provides a critical policy analysis method consisting of seven interrelated forms of questioning and analysis (Bacchi & Goodwin, 2016; Riemann, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacchi's (2009) method of “What is the problem represented to be?” (WPR) has been used for the critical analysis of policies in Indonesia. The WPR approach has been used for various social policy analyses, including for children's and adolescent policies (see, for example, Bills & Howard, 2017; Cordeiro & Mello, 2020; Komai, 2021; Skovhus & Thomsen, 2017; Tawell & Mccluskey, 2021; Wismayanti et al., 2021). This approach provides a critical policy analysis method consisting of seven interrelated forms of questioning and analysis (Bacchi & Goodwin, 2016; Riemann, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…– is an analytic strategy to aid interrogation of the epistemologies of policy by testing out deeply ingrained assumptions that determine how we think about a problem and its possible solutions. Beyond Bacchi’s own work on gender equality policy (see Bacchi and Eveline, 1996), researchers have used a WPR approach to study disability (Marshall, 2012), road safety (Tenório Cordeiro and Benício de Mello, 2020), education (Boelskifte Skovhus and Thomsen, 2017), health (Alexander and Coveney, 2013) and other settings. Scholars working with the WPR method use it to ‘work backwards’ from relevant semiotic artefacts – policy acts or initiatives, insider interviews, industry reports, websites, political speeches, curriculum, guidelines and so on – to examine how a policy problem is represented.…”
Section: Background: ‘Stultifying Oppressive and Discouraging’mentioning
confidence: 99%