Policy networks in global environmental governance: connecting the Blue Amazon to Antarctica and the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) agendas

Barros-Platiau, Ana Flávia; Søndergaard, Niels; Prantl, Jochen

doi:10.1590/0034-7329201900206

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An extensive research was conducted to analyze institutional frameworks, and this led to the formulation of an engagement agenda in ocean governance and Antarctic negotiations. The focus was on ensuring equitable distribution of network resources, particularly in the Amazon region, within the Blue policy network (Barros-Platiau et al, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research mapping of policy network: A bibliometric analysis

Tamrin,

Muhafidin,

Nurasa

et al. 2024

Chinese Public Administration Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The exploration of policy network has consistently gained popularity for its use in various contemporary public administration and policy reports. Therefore, this research aims to identify and analyze the extent of research developments regarding Policy Network in the past 37 years, from 1985 to 2022 using bibliometric data. The procedure comprised collecting data from the SCOPUS database with the keyword “Policy Network,” followed by bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer software. The results showed that several studies related to the keyword have been carried out on various important issues in society, including environmental, health, economic, poverty, national security, and tourism management. The term policy network occupied a central position and was widely discussed in previous reports. Furthermore, the majority of these reports were influenced by leading authors and published in top-tier journals in the field of public administration.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research mapping of policy network: A bibliometric analysis

Tamrin,

Muhafidin,

Nurasa

et al. 2024

Chinese Public Administration Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Brazil's approach to coastal and ocean governance has historically been under the leadership role of the Navy-from environmental and economic development through marine policy making and implementation strategies to ostensive control of national sovereignty, security, and science and technology [46][47][48]. For instance, CIRM was designated in 1974 [49], and since then, it has been statutorily chaired by the Navy.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Endless Endeavor: The Evolution and Challenges of Multi-Level Coastal Governance in the Global South

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We used Brazil as a Global South case study to analyze the evolution of the coastal governance in a young and still unstable democracy. Based on twenty-five years of documentation related to a federal-level actor interaction hub named Coastal Management Integration Group (GIGERCO) we explored the opportunity context for the transformation of the Brazilian coastal governance system using a Theory of Transformative Agency to identify five periods of evolution. The coastal governance system shifted from an exploitation to a conservation phase (periods 1 to 3), where an increasing number of actors were getting to know the system and each other’s interests turned into a moment of higher stability and resistance to change. The mobilization of social capital and higher heterogeneity of actors allowed novel strategies to emerge, generating opportunities for structural changes from a conservation towards a release phase (period 4). We argue that the recent political changes in Brazil caused a rupture in such a flourishing coastal governance process (period 5), which is now at a critical juncture that may unfold into one of three envisioned alternative scenarios: conservative regime, a new integrated and ecosystem-based regime, or a remanent of past regime properties. Our paper informs coastal governance processes across the world, highlighting the dynamic nature of the interplay between alternative institutional entrepreneurship strategies, opportunity contexts, and innovations in governance systems.

show abstract

“…Therefore, Brazil is in a puzzling situation with a brand new and well-equipped scientific station but no funds assured for the near future, as well as a largely outdated Antarctic policy. However, because MRE/Itamaraty was drastically reformed in early 2019, the Antarctic agenda was refocussed towards the Navy once again, along with the MCTI (Barros-Platiau et al 2019). Therefore, Antarctic research funding for the near future will depend mostly on the Navy, MCTI and National Congress representatives’ interactions, and, of course, on the Brazilian economic situation after the COVID-19 crisis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, this article aims to explore the key features of Brazilian Antarctic science by focusing on the question of how Brazilian scientific research in Antarctica evolved. The first feature is the domestic policy network (Barros-Platiau et al 2019), revealing the key role played by the Navy as a promoter, notably under former Brazilian military rule (1964–85), as well as in the recent past, after 2019. The Navy is the ‘maritime authority’ of the Brazilian policy network and the coordinator of an inter-ministerial commission created in 1974 (CIRM) and its secretariat (SECIRM) in 1979.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brazil in Antarctica: 40 years of science

Câmara

Barros-Platiau

Andrade³

et al. 2020

Antarctic Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2021, Brazilian scientific research in Antarctica will reach its 40 anniversary, and in that period it has experienced good and bad times. How has Brazilian scientific research evolved since its first scientific mission to Antarctica? What were the conditions that enabled this research? How will Brazilian researchers work in the brand-new scientific station? Using an interdisciplinary approach, this article identifies tipping points and the national policy network that led to unstable funding policies. This article highlights four phases of Brazilian Antarctic science and states that there is a clear disconnect between the geopolitical and scientific priorities on one side and the political priorities, including the executive and the legislative powers, on the other.

show abstract

Policy networks in global environmental governance: connecting the Blue Amazon to Antarctica and the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) agendas

Abstract: • Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados.

Cited by 5 publications

References 25 publications

Research mapping of policy network: A bibliometric analysis

Research mapping of policy network: A bibliometric analysis

An Endless Endeavor: The Evolution and Challenges of Multi-Level Coastal Governance in the Global South

Brazil in Antarctica: 40 years of science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About