Many worlds, many nature(s), one planet: indigenous knowledge in the Anthropocene

Inoue, Cristina Yumie Aoki; Moreira, Paula Franco

doi:10.1590/0034-7329201600209

Cited by 36 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They point out, for example, the marginalisation of indigenous and local knowledge in understanding and addressing the governance challenges of global environmental change. Such knowledge, these scholars argue, is vital, however, in bringing a more holistic worldview of nature and of human-nature relationships in contrast to the dichotomies (human versus nature) produced by modernity (Inoue and Moreira 2016;Inoue and Tickner 2016;Parsons et al 2017). This is because many indigenous cultures place a higher value on the spiritual and non-material aspects of all living species than what is often represented by Western discourses and governance approaches (see also Kohler et al 2019).…”

Section: Interplay Between Access and Allocation And Other Normsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Epistemological and ethical understandings of access and allocation in Earth System Governance: a 10-year review of the literature

Kalfagianni

Meisch

2020

Int Environ Agreements

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Access and allocation" is one of the five analytical problems identified as key for analysing earth system governance in the first Earth System Governance Science and Implementation Plan officially published in 2009. Ten years later and with a new Science and Implementation Plan in place, it is time to take stock. Therefore, this paper addresses the question: What does a decadal review of the Earth System Governance literature tell us about how to conceptualize and define access and allocation, what ethical norms and epistemologies underlie access and allocation research, and what does Earth System Governance scholarship reveal about the interplay between access and allocation and other norms? We find that: (a) there is a relatively small body of the Earth System Governance literature on access and allocation, albeit growing; (b) this literature is largely empirical and dispersed across a variety of topics; and (c) there is a diversity of ethical norms and principles emphasized in Earth System Governance scholarship, but the dynamics between different forms of access and related implications for allocation are relatively underexplored. In light of these findings and with a new Earth System Governance Science and Implementation Plan in place, this paper highlights key areas for further research and development.

show abstract

Section: Interplay Between Access and Allocation And Other Normsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Epistemological and ethical understandings of access and allocation in Earth System Governance: a 10-year review of the literature

Kalfagianni

Meisch

2020

Int Environ Agreements

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This teaches IR that there is an unbreakable link between the social and natural spheres, an understanding that is fundamental if IR is to guide informed action in an epoch in which human actions are the dominant force driving global environmental change. Hence, IR will have to abandon one of the central organizing logics upon which much of its security discourse is built, i.e., the nature-society dichotomy (Fagan 2017;Inoue and Moreira 2016). Humanity is now a geological agent, so our security and survival depend on our own actions.…”

Section: What Can Ir Learn From Embracing the Anthropocene Concept?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The limitations of ir theory regarding the environment: lessons from the anthropocene

Pereira

2017

Rev. bras. polít. int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

• Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da AbstractDespite its relevance in the global arena, the environment does not receive the attention that it deserves within the discipline of International Relations (IR). An analysis of all of the articles published in 20 journals of relevance in IR between 2004 and 2014 supports that environmental issues have largely been disregarded. This article traces IR's distant attitude towards the environment to its conventional disciplinary structures, arguing that the planet's new conditions challenge the discipline's dominant theory. It is suggested that, by rewriting itself and embracing the Anthropocene concept, IR may enhance its relevance and strengthen its impact. Recognizing uncertainty, abandoning the nature-society dichotomy and adopting a post-anthropocentric perspective are some of the possible pathways presented for the future of IR.

show abstract

“…). As lutas das comunidades indígenas, afrodescendentes, camponesas e urbanas pobres são lutas ontológicas em defesa de seus muitos mundos(ESCOBAR, 2016;MIGNOLO, 2002) em um único planetaMOREIRA, 2016).Mais do que reconhecer esses mundos, poderíamos aprender com eles(SANTOS, 2016, p. 22). Outros sistemas de conhecimento podem oferecer novas possibilidades que o conhecimento científico não consegue prever, especialmente se a real possibilidade de ultrapassarmos os limites planetários(ROCKSTRÖM et al, 2009).…”

unclassified

Abordagem dos muitos mundos aplicada ao estudo da política ambiental global no Antropoceno: vozes indígenas na Amazônia

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Muitas lutas socioambientais ao redor do mundo abraçam esforços em prol da proteção contra o desaparecimento de outros “mundos”. Ao lado da diversidade biológica, encontram-se ameaçadas as línguas, as tradições, os conhecimentos humanos, assim como as relações íntimas entre povos e suas terras, por várias formas de colonização, expansão do capital, ou simplesmente a globalização de estilos de viver. Estudiosos das relações internacionais começaram a despertar para o entendimento de que o mundo é composto por muitos mundos, e que essa diversidade se encontra ameaçada por fortes pressões. Este esforço tem sido essencial para a compreensão da luta em prol da manutenção desses muitos mundos em um único Planeta Terra. No entanto, esses estudos ainda não penetraram por completo os estudos de Política Ambiental Global (PAG). Este artigo expande essa sensibilidade e esforço acadêmico à PAG, ao dialogar com formas indígenas de conhecer. Defende-se que as lutas indígenas são lutas pela sobrevivência de muitos mundos em um único planeta e que há o que se aprender disso. Não se busca generalizar o conhecimento indígena, mas sim lançar uma chamada ao engajamento. Por meio da Escuta e da Fala Criativas, uma metodologia da abordagem dos muitos mundos, este artigo põe em foco o mundo-floresta dos Yanomami e apresenta algumas perspectivas para ilustrar como ontologias relacionais e histórias de divindades dialógicas e não hierárquicas, constroem formas de conhecer e de ser a partir das quais podemos aprender a nos relacionar com o Planeta Terra em pé de igualdade.

show abstract

Many worlds, many nature(s), one planet: indigenous knowledge in the Anthropocene

Cited by 36 publications

References 8 publications

Epistemological and ethical understandings of access and allocation in Earth System Governance: a 10-year review of the literature

Epistemological and ethical understandings of access and allocation in Earth System Governance: a 10-year review of the literature

The limitations of ir theory regarding the environment: lessons from the anthropocene

Abordagem dos muitos mundos aplicada ao estudo da política ambiental global no Antropoceno: vozes indígenas na Amazônia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About