Towards the Global Study of International Relations

Hurrell, Andrew

doi:10.1590/0034-7329201600208

Cited by 19 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Como afirma Andrew Hurrell (2016), algo mais fortemente global está em ação no mundo e os estudiosos das Relações Internacionais precisam ser capazes de reunir o mundo único e os Souza, J. A.…”

Section: A Modo De Conclusão: Balanços E Perspectivasunclassified

“…Não para propor uma teoria geral nem um pensamento único, mas para buscar modos mais apropriados de seguir inteligindo a realidade, que sempre surpreende o pesquisador com uma dinâmica de excesso, transbordamento que não alcançamos objetivar completamente (Santos, 2007). O campo das Relações Internacionais será enriquecido se se abre a outras fontes de conhecimento e a outras ciências, modos de conhecer e visões de mundo (Querejazu, 2016;Inoue, Tickner, 2016;Grosfoguel, 2008) e se as epistemologias, ontologias e ideias que daí emergem, em termos éticos e políticos, são oferecidos para serem compartilhados globalmente (Hurrell, 2016;Querejazu, 2016;Santos, 2010). Contudo, que conhecimento seria válido?…”

Section: A Modo De Conclusão: Balanços E Perspectivasunclassified

“…Terceiro, a visão alternativa não pode ser ingênua, precisa levar a sério as questões de poder. Como defende Hurrell (2016), não se pode pensar de forma estática o poder, a hierarquia e a hegemonia. A crítica ao pensamento Ocidental/moderno-colonial não elimina os múltiplos dinamismos interconectados de poder e suas novas formas que emergem das novas relações sociais no mundo global.…”

Section: A Modo De Conclusão: Balanços E Perspectivasunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Relações Internacionais e Pensamento Ocidental/Moderno-Colonial: Balanços e Perspectivas | International Relations and Western/Modern-colonial thinking: balances and perspectives

Souza¹

2020

RMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A predominância do pensamento Ocidental/moderno-colonial no campo das Relações Internacionais tem despertado críticas de estudiosos vinculados ao Pensamento Decolonial e a outras matrizes de conhecimento. Este trabalho tem por objetivo apresentar uma sistematização da fundamentação filosófica-epistemológica da crítica decolonial ao pensamento moderno e sua repercussão nas Relações Internacionais e, a partir dessas contribuições, propor uma aproximação com alguns estudos que, fora do âmbito da colonialidade, discutem a predominância de um pensamento ocidental na disciplina. Como consequência da aproximação entre esses saberes diversos, apresentamos alguns balanços e perspectivas para a área: a necessidade de conexão entre epistemologia-ética-política; a reabilitação de conhecimentos e modos de conhecer não-Ocidentais sem renunciar ao método científico; uma visão não ingênua que leve em conta as questões de poder; e uma articulação entre saber e poder, teoria e política para uma práxis situada e histórica vertida à realidade internacional.Palavras-chave: Racionalidade moderna; pensamento decolonial; epistemologia. ABSTRACTThe predominance of Western / modern-colonial thought in the field of International Relations has aroused criticism from scholars linked to Decolonial Thought and other knowledge matrices. This work aims to present a systematization of the philosophical-epistemological foundation of the decolonial critique of modern thought and its repercussion in International Relations and, based on these contributions, propose an approximation with some studies that, outside the scope of coloniality, discuss the predominance of a western thought in the discipline. As a consequence of the approximation between these diverse knowledges, we present some balances and perspectives for the area: the need for a connection between epistemology-ethics-politics; the rehabilitation of non-Western knowledge and ways of knowing without giving up the scientific method; a non-naive view that takes into account issues of power; and an articulation between knowledge and power, theory and politics for a situated and historical praxis turned to the international reality.Keywords: Modern rationality; decolonial thinking; epistemology. Recebido em: 29 jul. 2020 | Aceito em: 18 nov. 2020

show abstract

Section: A Modo De Conclusão: Balanços E Perspectivasunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relações Internacionais e Pensamento Ocidental/Moderno-Colonial: Balanços e Perspectivas | International Relations and Western/Modern-colonial thinking: balances and perspectives

Souza¹

2020

RMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, the extent to which certain universal values exist remains an important question. Normative theories of international relations, including that of the English's School's solidarist camp, tend to be very Eurocentric, which has sparked criticism among non-Western scholars and practitioners (Hurrell 2016). In discussions regarding China's rise, it indeed seems that the 'features of the New Standard of Civilization' (Fidler 2001, 150) form a normative basis for Western criticism of contemporary China.…”

Section: Pluralism Solidarism and Great Power Climate Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

China and Great Power Responsibility for Climate Change

Kopra¹

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As American leadership over climate change declines, China has begun to identify itself as a great power by formulating ambitious climate policies. Based on the premise that great powers have unique responsibilities, this book explores how China's rise to great power status transforms notions of great power responsibility in general and international climate politics in particular. The author looks empirically at the Chinese party-state's conceptions of state responsibility, discusses the influence of those notions on China's role in international climate politics, and considers both how China will act out its climate responsibility in the future and the broader implications of these actions. Alongside the argument that the international norm of climate responsibility is an emerging attribute of great power responsibility, Kopra develops a normative framework of great power responsibility to shed new light on the transformations China's rise will yield and the kind of great power China will prove to be. The book will be of interest to students and scholars of international relations, China studies, foreign policy studies, international organizations, international ethics and environmental politics.

show abstract

“…Most general accounts of regionalism explicitly or implicitly assign priority to distinctions specific to one function system within a scheme of first-order observation -typical candidates are politics, the economy, or science, as in some post-colonial perspectives (Hurrell 2016). They thus preserve a conceptual apparatus from classical sociology based on ontological nationalism -or, rather, in our case, ontological regionalism: one problem -be it economic dependence, political disunity or intellectual coloniality -can stand for the whole, can be directly observed, and might be solved or ameliorated through political processes such as initiatives towards regional integration.…”

Section: Functional Differentiation As the Context Of Regionalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differentiation theory and the ontologies of regionalism in Latin America

Kleinschmidt

Pérez

2017

Rev. bras. polít. int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

• Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da AbstractIn this article, we argue that conventional understandings of regional integration based on neo-functionalism, hitherto often used to describe the diverse projects of Latin American regionalism, are of limited utility in that context. Rather than representing processes of economic or political unification, the various regionalisms could be understood more productively as a reaction to the crisis in legitimacy that social orders in the region have experienced under the conditions of globalized modernity. We then deploy an understanding of regionalism derived from sociological differentiation theory in order to advance this argument.

show abstract

Towards the Global Study of International Relations

Cited by 19 publications

References 15 publications

Relações Internacionais e Pensamento Ocidental/Moderno-Colonial: Balanços e Perspectivas | International Relations and Western/Modern-colonial thinking: balances and perspectives

Relações Internacionais e Pensamento Ocidental/Moderno-Colonial: Balanços e Perspectivas | International Relations and Western/Modern-colonial thinking: balances and perspectives

China and Great Power Responsibility for Climate Change

Differentiation theory and the ontologies of regionalism in Latin America

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About