1976
DOI: 10.1590/0034-716719760004000013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise Crítica De Impressões Plantares De Recém-Nascidos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on 1917 footprints collected by trained staff of a hospital in Brazil. They concluded that none of the images provided sufficient information to perform accurate identification [12,13]. Further biometrics researchers explored the applicability of other biometrics feature like fingerprint/ palmprint and ear for recognition of infants.…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on 1917 footprints collected by trained staff of a hospital in Brazil. They concluded that none of the images provided sufficient information to perform accurate identification [12,13]. Further biometrics researchers explored the applicability of other biometrics feature like fingerprint/ palmprint and ear for recognition of infants.…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, due to illegibility problems, the use of these footprints for identification purposes is not possible in the majority of cases. According to several studies (Cat, 2003;Shepard et al, 1966;Pelá et al, 1975;Lomuto and Duverges, 1995;Thompson et al, 1981), the main reasons for illegible footprints are:…”
Section: Footprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to study [7] on1917 foot prints collected by trained staff of hospital in Brazil, where most of the images collected provided insufficient information for identification of newborn [7]. Researchers also explored the applicability of other biometric modalities such as fingerprint, palm print and ear for verifying the identity of newborn babies [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%