2020
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection: evaluation methods

Abstract: Objective: To discuss the methods employed to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface cleaning and disinfection (C&D). Method: This is a theoretical reflection based on scientific studies and the experience of the authors. Knowledge and current gaps, the need for further studies, and practical application of the methods were approached. Results: There are four main methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical surface C&D: visual inspection, fluorescent markers, microbiological cultur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 24.49% of the observations made, the professionals touched the patients' surfaces wearing gloves before performing the procedure. This non-conformity is extremely worrying, since the professional can make the surface hygiene become invalid, allowing the crosstransmission of microorganisms and the occurrence of HCRI (19) . Still regarding the inappropriate use of gloves, a worrying situation found in this study was that in 13.13% of the opportunities, professionals did not use gloves even though they had the indication for use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 24.49% of the observations made, the professionals touched the patients' surfaces wearing gloves before performing the procedure. This non-conformity is extremely worrying, since the professional can make the surface hygiene become invalid, allowing the crosstransmission of microorganisms and the occurrence of HCRI (19) . Still regarding the inappropriate use of gloves, a worrying situation found in this study was that in 13.13% of the opportunities, professionals did not use gloves even though they had the indication for use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, there is a propensity to false-positive results when certain disinfecting agents have been used to clean a surface. Also no pathogen can be identified with ATP measurement [17]. These factors should be given consideration before performing ATP measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also no pathogen can be identified with ATP measurement. 17 These factors should be given consideration before performing ATP measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%