2020
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20200003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Orofacial Pain Clinic Questionnaire (EDOF-HC) in the evaluation and diagnosis of orofacial pain

Abstract: ABSTRACT Background: Diagnostic tools are necessary for the anamnesis and examination of orofacial pain, in order to fulfill diagnostic criteria and to screen potential causes of pain. Objective: To evaluate the Orofacial Pain Clinic Questionnaire (EDOF-HC) in the assessment and diagnosis of orofacial pain. Methods: Overall, 142 patients were evaluated and classified according to the criteria of the International Headache Society and International Association for the Study of Pain. All of them we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adults, male or female, aged 18 years and above, diagnosed with TMDs by a clinician through signs and symptoms, or using standardized tools such as the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular disorder (DC/TMD), 25 the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular disorder (RDC/TMD) 26 or other recognized tools (i.e. the Orofacial Pain Clinic Questionnaire (EDOF‐HC)) 27 . Patients with any of the different TMD subtypes described in detail below (section describing primary outcome) were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adults, male or female, aged 18 years and above, diagnosed with TMDs by a clinician through signs and symptoms, or using standardized tools such as the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular disorder (DC/TMD), 25 the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular disorder (RDC/TMD) 26 or other recognized tools (i.e. the Orofacial Pain Clinic Questionnaire (EDOF‐HC)) 27 . Patients with any of the different TMD subtypes described in detail below (section describing primary outcome) were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O diagnóstico é alcançado, muitas vezes, por meio da avaliação histórico médico, exame clínico e físico minucioso realizado pela palpação muscular dos pontos-gatilho, dando ênfase à sintomatologia da dor. Frequentemente é utilizado uma escala visual analógica (EVA) para que seja aferido a intensidade da dor (Siqueira et al, 2020;Urits et al, 2020).…”
Section: Papel Do Cirurgião Dentista No Diagnóstico Da Sdm Na Faceunclassified