2017
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20170106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grey zone between narcolepsy type 1 and type 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with type II narcolepsy usually have levels of hypocretin-1, one greater than 200 pg/mL. 1,35 The literature should provide a more comprehensive discussion of the gray zone between 110 pg/mL and 200 pg/mL. Studies have reported cases of patients with hypocretin-1 levels within this range.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Patients with type II narcolepsy usually have levels of hypocretin-1, one greater than 200 pg/mL. 1,35 The literature should provide a more comprehensive discussion of the gray zone between 110 pg/mL and 200 pg/mL. Studies have reported cases of patients with hypocretin-1 levels within this range.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While biomarkers are beneficial for identifying type I narcolepsy, identifying patients with narcolepsy type II remains challenging in many cases. 35 Unfortunately, in real life, there is a delay of over ten years for the diagnosis of narcolepsy around the world. 36 Many causes can explain this reality, such as the lack of knowledge on the disorder, incorrect diagnosis of depression, prejudice of familiar members and society about EDS, and few tools for clinicians.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequent studies have implemented these cutoffs [ 9 , 10 ], as has the ICSD3 [ 3 , 11 ]. Consequently, an intermediate CSF hypocretin-1 range of 111–200 pg/mL was created, resulting in a patient subgroup that is more difficult to diagnose unless there are clear features of typical cataplexy and positive MSLT and PSG findings [ 12 ]. Moreover, at the time these hypocretin-1 cutoff values were determined, the criteria for the differential diagnosis of NT1 and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) were not yet established, as narcolepsy was then classified as narcolepsy with or without cataplexy [ 8 ] We need to characterize individuals with intermediate CSF hypocretin-1 levels, by re-examining the current hypocretin-1 cutoff value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%