2015
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20150163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why this is not multiple sclerosis: a case based approach

Abstract: Objective To present a case series of patients previously diagnosed as multiple sclerosis (MS) which were later confirmed as an alternative diagnosis, and describe the clinical and paraclinical signs that led to this change. Method Nine patients are described. We reviewed the patient’s clinical chart, magnetic resonance images (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid. Results There was a mean of three typical symptoms of MS and four clinical red flags per patient. MRI red flags were found in 88,9% of all referrals, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has limitations pertinent to any self-reported survey, including misdiagnosis, recall and interpretation bias of one's own symptomatic history, not having neurologic function and disability objectively measured and not analyzing the impact of specific therapies and interventions on employment status. Misdiagnosis of MS is estimated to occur all around the world, including research centers, and estimated to be around 2% to 5% of actual patients, including those receiving regular disease modification therapies 22,23 . Answering these questions requires a survey with a larger questionnaire and longer duration, including medical chart access and review, which is a much more detailed work that could not be completed in such a short time or include a large national sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has limitations pertinent to any self-reported survey, including misdiagnosis, recall and interpretation bias of one's own symptomatic history, not having neurologic function and disability objectively measured and not analyzing the impact of specific therapies and interventions on employment status. Misdiagnosis of MS is estimated to occur all around the world, including research centers, and estimated to be around 2% to 5% of actual patients, including those receiving regular disease modification therapies 22,23 . Answering these questions requires a survey with a larger questionnaire and longer duration, including medical chart access and review, which is a much more detailed work that could not be completed in such a short time or include a large national sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%