2023
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202320210528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of the antartic ozone hole influence events over southern Brazil in October 2015

ALANNA M. DE SOUZA,
LUCAS V. PERES,
GABRIELA D. BITTENCOURT
et al.

Abstract: The impact of the Antarctic Ozone Hole Influence over Southern Brazil in October 2015 was analyzed using daily mean data of the Total Column Ozone (TCO), Ultraviolet Index (UVI) and Radiative Cloud Fraction (RCF) from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument satellite instrument. Vertical profiles and fields of ozone content and Potential Vorticity available from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast reanalysis, air masses backward trajectories from the HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Traje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been encouraging new studies that aim to simulate and predict these events [68], using deep learning [90] and a new dataset, ERA-5 reanalysis [91], to investigate the long-term atmospheric dynamics behavior [92]. In October 2015, these events led to a +16.6 ± 54.6% UVI increase, even with a predominance of partly cloudy days [93]. All these factors corroborate the importance of the analysis carried out in this work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This has been encouraging new studies that aim to simulate and predict these events [68], using deep learning [90] and a new dataset, ERA-5 reanalysis [91], to investigate the long-term atmospheric dynamics behavior [92]. In October 2015, these events led to a +16.6 ± 54.6% UVI increase, even with a predominance of partly cloudy days [93]. All these factors corroborate the importance of the analysis carried out in this work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%