2021
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202120200261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles not metrics: the case of Brazilian universities

Abstract: Public universities, and science in general, in Brazil, are under attack from key persons of the government in interviews and articles published in non-scientifi c journals. Here we look at bibliography data from international science metric platforms (Scival® and Incites®) and offi cial Brazilian agencies such as CAPES and CNPq to reach some conclusions based on scientifi c analysis. Brazilian Science has shown a steady improvement in quantity and quality over the last 20 years but has recently suffered (sinc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with the previous information, demonstrating that the regions where there is a greater number of papers/sequences are not necessarily the regions in which the institutions responsible for such studies are located. This is due to the great concentration of researchers, institutions, universities, and botanical collections in southeastern Brazil (Nabout et al 2015;Noga & Gomes 2018;Gasper et al 2020;Mcmanus et al 2021) with infrastructure and funding to carry out the stages of molecular biology and bioinformatics work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are in line with the previous information, demonstrating that the regions where there is a greater number of papers/sequences are not necessarily the regions in which the institutions responsible for such studies are located. This is due to the great concentration of researchers, institutions, universities, and botanical collections in southeastern Brazil (Nabout et al 2015;Noga & Gomes 2018;Gasper et al 2020;Mcmanus et al 2021) with infrastructure and funding to carry out the stages of molecular biology and bioinformatics work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other problems here come from the non-continuity of projects and policies in the definition of priority, where the meaning of everything as a priority means that nothing is a priority (McManus et al, 2021). The multiplication of the number of master's and doctoral degrees, in general, is the primary goal of the last PNPG (2011-2020).…”
Section: Sucupira-213mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the publication activity in Brazil are often conducted in terms of statistics and bibliometrics (Carvalho Neto et al, 2016;Clarivate Analytics, 2018;Mcmanus et al, 2021;Mugnaini et al, 2014;Packer, 2014;Sidone et al, 2016). Literature on the topic of writing for publication is less frequent and focuses mainly on two areas: criticism related to government policies and scholars' practices (Antunes, 2015;Domingues, 2014;Zuin & Bianchetti, 2015) and quality-related problems, especially regarding the quality of the research and of the writing (Albuquerque, 2009;Alcadipani, 2017;Falaster et al, 2016;Kuhlmann Jr., 2014.…”
Section: Studies In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%