2019
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201920190711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhinoxenus (Dactylogyridae) parasitizing piranhas (Serrasalmidae) at its southernmost limit of distribution (Paraná River, Argentina), with the description of two new species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genus Anacanthorus includes ~92 valid species (Table 2 and Figure 4), which are gill parasites of characiform fishes of the Serrasalmidae (41 species), Triportheidae (20 species), Bryconidae (19 species), Erythrinidae (eight species), and Characidae (four species). Brazil harbours the greatest number of Anacanthorus taxa (Jégu & dos Santos, 2001;Rossin et al, 2019). However, for the Northern Brazil basin, the identification of S. spilopleura is still valid, so records of S. spilopleura in the northern basins were not included in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The genus Anacanthorus includes ~92 valid species (Table 2 and Figure 4), which are gill parasites of characiform fishes of the Serrasalmidae (41 species), Triportheidae (20 species), Bryconidae (19 species), Erythrinidae (eight species), and Characidae (four species). Brazil harbours the greatest number of Anacanthorus taxa (Jégu & dos Santos, 2001;Rossin et al, 2019). However, for the Northern Brazil basin, the identification of S. spilopleura is still valid, so records of S. spilopleura in the northern basins were not included in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Braz *Parasitological reports from the Paraná River basin address the species Serrasalmus maculatus and Serrasalmus spilopleura Kner, 1860, as they were all synonymized with S. maculatus (Jégu & dos Santos, 2001;Rossin et al, 2019). However, for the Northern Brazil basin, the identification of S. spilopleura is still valid, so records of S. spilopleura in the northern basins were not included in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation