2016
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201620150194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage and cytotoxicity in pathology laboratory technicians exposed to organic solvents

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate potential DNA damage and cytotoxicity in pathology laboratory technicians exposed to organic solvents, mainly xylene. Peripheral blood and buccal cells samples were collected from 18 technicians occupationally exposed to organic solvents and 11 non-exposed individuals. The technicians were sampled at two moments: Monday and Friday. DNA damage and cytotoxicity were evaluated using the Comet Assay and the Buccal Micronucleus Cytome assay. Fifteen subjects (83.5%) of the expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 43 studies (86.0%) used either environmental or biological monitoring of exposure or both. Studies with exposure evaluation by questionnaire (n = 7; 14.0%) [ 96 , 362 , 364 , 370 , 380 , 382 , 383 ] were considered as limited regarding evidence. A significant increase in DNA damage in subjects exposed to solvents, or a positive correlation between DNA damage and exposure markers, was reported in 41 studies (82.0%) [of which 7 were limited based on the exposure evaluation], whereas in 8 studies (16.3%), the authors did not find any effect; in 1 paper (2.0%) a significant decrease in DNA damage was observed in the exposed subjects [ 374 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 43 studies (86.0%) used either environmental or biological monitoring of exposure or both. Studies with exposure evaluation by questionnaire (n = 7; 14.0%) [ 96 , 362 , 364 , 370 , 380 , 382 , 383 ] were considered as limited regarding evidence. A significant increase in DNA damage in subjects exposed to solvents, or a positive correlation between DNA damage and exposure markers, was reported in 41 studies (82.0%) [of which 7 were limited based on the exposure evaluation], whereas in 8 studies (16.3%), the authors did not find any effect; in 1 paper (2.0%) a significant decrease in DNA damage was observed in the exposed subjects [ 374 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, in ward A, the following conditions contributed to the worse air quality as compared to ward B: (a) manual staining with baskets holder slides and trays mounting; (b) the fume hoods used for slide manipulation and inclusion had little depth and were often kept opened because of the large size of the equipment contained (paraffin inclusion unit); (c) inadequate thermal conditioning causing temperatures unsuitable for the laboratories (measured temperature 27 ± 4 °C); these high temperatures further favored VOC volatilization contributing to their dispersion in the air. The inadequacy of the workplaces can contribute to increasing the chemical hazard within the anatomical pathology laboratories as found by a previous study where pathology laboratory technicians inappropriately exposed to organic solvents had developed increased levels of DNA damage [25]. However, for organizational reasons, the two wards were provisionally gathered together in the largest structure, with ward A now including ward B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of these solvents have a negative impact on our ecosystem because they cause ozone layer depletion, and contribute to tropospheric smog formation. In addition to the effect of these solvents on the human health, some of these solvents are neurotoxins, may cause sterility, or may cause cancer, so the utilization of these solvents is not accepted from environmental and health point of view (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%