Trade-off between number of constraints and primary-statement robustness in entropy models: the case of the open-channel velocity field

Abstract

In this research, the trade-off between the number of restrictions and the robustness of the primary formulation of entropy models was evaluated. The performance of six hydrodynamic models in open channels was assessed based on 1730 Laser-Doppler anemometry data. It was investigated whether it is better to use an entropy-based model with more restrictions and a weak primary formulation or a model with fewer restrictions, but with a strong formulation. In addition, it was also investigated whether the model performance improves with the insertion of restrictions. Three of the investigated models have a weak formulation (open-channel velocity field represented by Cartesian coordinates); while the other three models have a strong formulation, according to which isovels are represented by curvilinear coordinates. The results indicated that models with two restrictions performed better than those with one restriction, since the additional restriction includes information relevant to the system. Models with three restrictions perform worse than those with two restrictions, because the information lost due to the use of a numerical solution was more substantial than the information gained by the third restriction. In conclusion, a strong primary formulation brought more information to the system than the inclusion of a third constraint.

Entropy-Based Temporal Downscaling of Precipitation as Tool for Sediment Delivery Ratio Assessment

“…In the selection of the best distribution using the PoME, additionally to the constraints listed in Table 1 , there is an implicit assumption taken: that the data follow a specified distribution (i.e., beta, gamma, uniform, etc.). Silva Filho et al [ 67 ] pointed out that the selected constraints of the PoME have to be relevant to the studied variable and that additional constraints do not necessarily lead to better results. Therefore, as we see in Figure 3 and Figure 4 , the narrowest distribution does not necessarily best suit the model.…”

Maximum Entropy Distribution of Rainfall Intensity and Duration – MEDRID: a method for precipitation temporal downscaling for sediment delivery assessment

“…beta, gamma, uniform, etc.). Silva Filho et al (2020) pointed out that the selected constrains of the PoME have to be relevant to the studied variable and that additional constrains do not necessarily lead to better results. Therefore, as we see in Figures 3 and 4, the narrowest distribution does not necessarily suit best the model.…”