“…In this process of consolidation of the field, certain shared understandings are established. Among them, the main one would be that organizational practice is composed of an aesthetic dimension (already mentioned in previous paragraphs), which makes the approach of organizational aesthetics a powerful theorization to understand phenomena as distinct as leadership (Azimi, Alvedari, & Nia, 2016;Bathurst & Cain, 2013;Bathurst & Kennedy, 2017;Bathurst & Williams, 2014;Hansen et al, 2007), entrepreneurship ( (Poldner, Shrivastava, & Branzei, 2017) and organizational practices (Soares & Bispo, 2017). Another shared understanding can be identified around the challenges in grasping this aesthetic dimension, which is not always evident and which makes the so-called traditional methodological approaches (i.e., the ones that use traditional tools of social research and are based on a rational-cognitive paradigm) relatively common in the 2000s (Taylor & Hansen, 2005), giving increasingly more space to alternative approaches.…”