As causas de ações violentas de mulheres jovens

Köttig, Michaela

doi:10.15448/1984-7289.2016.1.24051

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Biographical methods are also used in research fields such as the transgenerational consequences of the Second World War, National Socialism, the Holocaust, the history of East Germany (Alheit 1995;Inowlocki 2000;Kazmierska 2002Kazmierska , 2012Miethe 2002 a;Pohn-Weidinger 2014;, or people who have been, or still are, active in political resistance movements (Miethe 2002 b;Pohn-Lauggas 2016;Schiebel and Robel 2011). Other important areas are gender research, (Apitzsch 2012; Dausien 1996Dausien , 2002Haas 2016;Lutz 2011), research on socialization, especially the political socialization of young people (Hinrichsen 2017;Inowlocki 2000;Köttig 2016;Santos 2010;Schiebel 2000), and, more recently, studies in urban sociology (Bahl 2017;Becker 2016Becker , 2017Witte 2016Witte , 2017, and research on collective, familial and individual memories (Kazmierska 2012;Mamul 2009;Rosenthal 2016Rosenthal a, 2016. Together with other scholars, the present author is carrying out research in the field of conflict and peace studies in the Middle East and in African countries (Uganda, Ghana and countries in North Africa), using a figurational biographical approach (see Becker 2013Becker , 2017Rosenthal 2016a;Bogner / Rosenthal 2014Bogner / Rosenthal / Schmiereck 2017).…”

Section: On the Necessity Of Asking In-depth Questions 55mentioning

confidence: 99%

Interpretive social research

Shipman¹

2014

The Limitations of Social Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gabriele Rosenthal: Interpretive Social Research principle "to present complex ideas as clearly and simply as possible". For many years now, I have been conducting research in countries in the Global South (see Rosenthal 2016 a; Rosenthal / Bogner 2017a), and have of necessity adapted my own methodological approach; for instance, I have used different data collecting methods depending on the nature of the field, ease of access to the field, or the chances of gaining knowledge in various research contexts. I have increasingly employed a combination of different methods (Rosenthal 2016 b), including methods that are not discussed in this book, such as group discussions. I would therefore like to emphasize that although different methods for collecting and analyzing data are distinguished in this book, I do not intend to suggest that it is necessary to choose just one method in any given research process.Over the years, many colleagues have commented on different chapters. I am extremely grateful for all their critical suggestions. I would also like to thank all the students whose research I have supervised, and who have constantly confronted me with a dilemma that can be expressed in the form of two questions: To what extent are "recipe instructions" helpful? And when do such prescriptions stand in the way of scientific creativity and sensitive handling of the special features of a particular case? From participating in the work of my colleagues, especially in the joint interpretation of their empirical data, not only have I gained insights into very different social settings or lifeworlds, but I have also learned more in respect of methodology than I am probably aware of. My thanks also go to all those who have helped me with the production of this English edition, in particular by updating the anglophone literature and seeking out English translations of the classic texts cited:

show abstract