2019
DOI: 10.1186/s41155-018-0114-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrelevant sound interference on phonological and tonal working memory in musicians and nonmusicians

Abstract: Background: Working memory refers to the cognitive system responsible for the temporary storage and maintenance of information, but it remains controversial whether overlapping processes underlie the temporary retention of verbal and musical information such as words and tones. Methods: Participants with little or no musical training (n = 22) and professional musicians (n = 21) were administered four memory tasks. Two tasks (tone sequence recognition and pseudoword sequence recall) aimed at comparing groups' p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to reject the assumption of content-based interference might have been premature, given the evidence that supports a role of similarity in the disruption of serial recall performance by irrelevant sounds. Specifically, it has been shown that speech or speech-like sounds are more disruptive to verbal serial recall than non-speech sounds (Schlittmeier et al, 2012), even with acoustic complexity controlled (Dorsi et al, 2018;Viswanathan et al, 2014), that the magnitude of the ISE depends on the overlap of phonetic features (though not of the phonemes) in the irrelevant speech tokens and the list items (Eagan & Chein, 2012), and that speech interferes more with the serial order retention of verbal when compared to tonal items, whereas irrelevant tones interfere more with the retention of tonal when compared to verbal sequences (Defilippi et al, 2019;Kattner & Meinhardt, 2020;Williamson et al, 2010). These findings suggest an important role of between-stream-similarity in the disruptive effects or irrelevant sounds, and thus contentbased interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to reject the assumption of content-based interference might have been premature, given the evidence that supports a role of similarity in the disruption of serial recall performance by irrelevant sounds. Specifically, it has been shown that speech or speech-like sounds are more disruptive to verbal serial recall than non-speech sounds (Schlittmeier et al, 2012), even with acoustic complexity controlled (Dorsi et al, 2018;Viswanathan et al, 2014), that the magnitude of the ISE depends on the overlap of phonetic features (though not of the phonemes) in the irrelevant speech tokens and the list items (Eagan & Chein, 2012), and that speech interferes more with the serial order retention of verbal when compared to tonal items, whereas irrelevant tones interfere more with the retention of tonal when compared to verbal sequences (Defilippi et al, 2019;Kattner & Meinhardt, 2020;Williamson et al, 2010). These findings suggest an important role of between-stream-similarity in the disruptive effects or irrelevant sounds, and thus contentbased interference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, studying music incorporates both auditory training and multimodal training, as a result of the reading and translation of musical symbols into the physical movements of playing an instrument. This exposure to FMT can have an impact on parts of musicians working memory and changes within the auditory system that can prime musicians for increased challenges in realms beyond music (Defilippi et al, 2019; George & Coch, 2011; Schlaug et al, 2005; Schulze & Koelsch, 2012). This helps explain the results because participants with FMT that develop these skills may be more intentional about their response when they are not sure that they have the correct answer, suggestive of improved meta-cognition (Flavell, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies have proposed separate memory systems for pitch and verbal material [ 22 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. Evidence for this has been demonstrated in healthy participants, who are impaired at recognizing and maintaining tones in STM when there is interference of irrelevant tones, but not words [ 58 , 60 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies have proposed separate memory systems for pitch and verbal material [ 22 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. Evidence for this has been demonstrated in healthy participants, who are impaired at recognizing and maintaining tones in STM when there is interference of irrelevant tones, but not words [ 58 , 60 ]. Studies in congenital amusia also propose that STM for pitch and verbal STM are dissociable [ 22 , 34 ], based on findings of spared verbal STM, with impaired pitch memory [ 1 , 23 , 61 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%