2023
DOI: 10.11606/1678-9857.ra.2022.201158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Da colonialidade do ver ao cinema indígena: apontamentos sobre a (contra)colonialidade em Abya Yala

Marcos Aurélio Felipe

Abstract: Qual é o mundo histórico (re)elaborado pelas cinematografias indígenas à contrapelo aos regimes de visualidade constitutivos da colonialidade do ver sobre os povos originários de Abya Yala? Analisamos a (des)construção imagética do Outro, a partir dos estudos pós-coloniais, antropológicos e de cinema. Focamos nas formas visuais da iconografia, da fotografia e do filme, tensionadas pelo cinema indígena por um processo de reversão formal que enseja outras variáveis históricas. Concluímos que o cinema originário … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there is no boundary between the purely formal and the purely real, we look for the cracks in order to reflect on original cinematographies, because self-referentiality is the contribution to how historical agents constitute themselves as subjects in cinema. This is a question that has been at the forefront of our research into indigenous cinema for some time, and recurs in our reflections when, more recently, for example, we (re)positioned the indigenous subject of the camera on the stage of history and cinema, as opposed to the colonial parametrization of the Other through the visuality regimes of modernity/Westernism -founded on iconography, anthropometric portraits and the classic ethnographic film (Felipe, 2023).…”
Section: Part 1 -Prologuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If there is no boundary between the purely formal and the purely real, we look for the cracks in order to reflect on original cinematographies, because self-referentiality is the contribution to how historical agents constitute themselves as subjects in cinema. This is a question that has been at the forefront of our research into indigenous cinema for some time, and recurs in our reflections when, more recently, for example, we (re)positioned the indigenous subject of the camera on the stage of history and cinema, as opposed to the colonial parametrization of the Other through the visuality regimes of modernity/Westernism -founded on iconography, anthropometric portraits and the classic ethnographic film (Felipe, 2023).…”
Section: Part 1 -Prologuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have pointed out elsewhere, those who film, what they film and who is filmed -the three dimensions of the reverse filmic pragmatics of indigenous cinema -belong to the same documentary locus (Felipe, 2023). Therein, an issue arises, because when the mirrors are reversed, the subjectobject relationship is reversed (?…”
Section: Part 4 -Other Windows Openmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como já pontuamos em outro momento, quem filma, o que filma e quem é filmado -as três dimensões da pragmática fílmica reversa do cinema indígena -pertencem ao mesmo lócus documental (Felipe, 2023). Aqui, portanto, uma problemática se impõe, pois, ao inverterem-se os espelhos, inverte-se a relação sujeito-objeto (?…”
Section: Parte 4 -Outras Janelas Se Abremunclassified
“…Presença, Porto Alegre, v. 14, n. 1, e134450, 2024. Disponível em: http://seer.ufrgs.br/presenca 6 história e do cinema o sujeito indígena da câmera em contraponto à parametrização colonial do Outro pelos regimes de visualidade da modernidade/ocidental -fundados na iconografia, nos retratos antropométricos e no filme etnográfico clássico (Felipe, 2023).…”
unclassified