Post COVID-19 recovery for independent full-service restaurants using the salience theory: what will it take to get customers to return?

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to compare customers’ perceived importance of various post-COVID-19 recovery strategies (i.e. sanitary practices, discounts, menu modification and marketing strategies) adopted by independent full-service restaurants (casual dining versus upscale/fine dining) using the salience theory. It also assesses the associations between customers’ perceptions and their restaurant spending patterns. Design/methodology/approach An online survey was administered to assess 657 US adult participants’ restaurant spending behaviors at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic using recall questions. Higher-spending versus lower-spending participants’ perceived importance of restaurant recovery strategies were compared in the casual dining versus upscale/fine dining contexts. Findings Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, sanitary practices were the most important factor in participants’ restaurant choices, and it was more important for independent casual dining restaurants than for upscale/fine dining restaurants. No significant difference was found in participants’ perceived importance of sanitary practices across different geographic regions. Higher-spending diners (HSD) perceived almost every restaurant recovery strategy as important. Lower-spending diners (LSD) only considered sanitary practices as important. Practical implications This study identified important strategies that restaurant operators and public health officials can adopt to help full-service restaurants recover from pandemic losses. Originality/value This study differs from previous consumer choice studies; in that it compared HSD with LSD regarding their perceived importance of various restaurant recovery strategies. This study also provides new insights for understanding the salience theory of choice under the impact of COVID-19.

The Impact of The Pandemic on the Informal Eating Out Habits of Filipino Diners in Dubai, United Arab Emirates

“…Filipino diners in Dubai have been forced to rely more on alternative dining options such as food delivery services and takeaways. According to a study conducted by Wang et al, diners' patronage intentions were greatly affected by safety measures and the crowdedness of restaurants (Sun et al, 2022). This suggests that the perception of safety plays a crucial role in Filipino diners' decision to eat out or opt for food delivery services during the pandemic.…”

To whom do restaurants’ preventive measures matter more during a pandemic? The moderating effects of need-for-cognition and relationship strength

“…Even after the reopening of indoor dining, safety concerns held customers back from dining in restaurants (National Restaurant Association, 2020). COVID-19-related hospitality studies published between 2020 and 2022 identified facilitators and barriers to customers’ dining in restaurants (Kostromitina et al , 2021; Ma et al , 2022; Sun et al , 2022; Tuzovic et al , 2021; Wei et al , 2021). Among several factors, reducing restaurant customers’ anxiety through PM was considered crucial in drawing customers back to in-restaurant dining (Byrd et al , 2022; Jeong et al , 2022; Kim et al , 2021a).…”