1996
DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Branched Phenotype of the Petunia dad1-1 Mutant Is Reversed by Grafting

Abstract: The recessive dadl-7 allele conditions a highly branched growth habit resulting from a proliferation of first-and second-order branches. Unlike the wild-type parent, which has lateral branching delayed until the third or fourth leaf node dista1 to the cotyledons, dadl-7 initiates lateral branching from each cotyledon axil. I n addition to initiating lateral branching sooner than the wild type, dadl-7 sustains branching through more nodes on the main shoot axis than the wild type. I n keeping with a propensity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
156
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
10
156
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenotype has been observed in stem cuttings of pea (Fig. 2) (Rasmussen et al 2012) and tomato ) and etiolated hypocotyls of Arabidopsis (Rasmussen et al 2012) and as well as in lower stems of intact petunia lacking endogenous strigolactones (Napoli 1996). Exogenous strigolactone treatments inhibited adventitious rooting in a MAX2/RMS4-dependent manner Rasmussen et al 2012) and biosynthesis mutants from pea (rms5) but not from Arabidopsis (max4) were more sensitive to exogenous GR24 application than the wild type (Rasmussen et al 2012).…”
Section: Strigolactones Inhibit Adventitious Root Formationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This phenotype has been observed in stem cuttings of pea (Fig. 2) (Rasmussen et al 2012) and tomato ) and etiolated hypocotyls of Arabidopsis (Rasmussen et al 2012) and as well as in lower stems of intact petunia lacking endogenous strigolactones (Napoli 1996). Exogenous strigolactone treatments inhibited adventitious rooting in a MAX2/RMS4-dependent manner Rasmussen et al 2012) and biosynthesis mutants from pea (rms5) but not from Arabidopsis (max4) were more sensitive to exogenous GR24 application than the wild type (Rasmussen et al 2012).…”
Section: Strigolactones Inhibit Adventitious Root Formationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Dad1 mutants initiate branches from all nodes ( Supplementary Fig. 8d), and although branch elongation is retarded compared with the wild type, these mutants eventually produce full branches from every node 20,30 . At flowering time, this results in a phenotype that is more pronounced than in any of the pdr1 mutants, which have final branch patterns that differ only marginally from the respective wild-type plants ( Supplementary Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mild branching phenotype of pdr1 mutants relative to the strigolactone-biosynthesis mutant dad1 (ref. 30) suggests that residual transport and/or locally produced strigolactones may compensate for defective strigolactone transport in the shoot. However, arbuscular mycorrhizal development was affected to a similar degree in the pdr1 and dad1 mutants, revealing that below-ground strigolactone transport and secretion relies primarily on PDR1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxically, the mutants were found to have generally higher levels of auxin and lower levels of xylem cytokinin, facts difficult to reconcile with ideas about the roles of auxin and cytokinin in regulating bud outgrowth (Beveridge et al, 1997). These mutants were ramosus (rms) in pea (Pisum sativum), decreased apical dominance (dad) in petunia (Petunia hybrida), more axillary growth (max) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and particular dwarf (d) mutants in rice (Oryza sativa; Beveridge et al, 1994;Napoli, 1996;Stirnberg et al, 2002;Ishikawa et al, 2005). Grafting studies demonstrated that increased bud outgrowth in some of the mutants was caused by the loss of a long-distance mobile signal (termed SMS; Beveridge, 2006) that moved upward from lower tissues (Beveridge et al, 1994;Napoli, 1996;Foo et al, 2001;Turnbull et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutants were ramosus (rms) in pea (Pisum sativum), decreased apical dominance (dad) in petunia (Petunia hybrida), more axillary growth (max) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and particular dwarf (d) mutants in rice (Oryza sativa; Beveridge et al, 1994;Napoli, 1996;Stirnberg et al, 2002;Ishikawa et al, 2005). Grafting studies demonstrated that increased bud outgrowth in some of the mutants was caused by the loss of a long-distance mobile signal (termed SMS; Beveridge, 2006) that moved upward from lower tissues (Beveridge et al, 1994;Napoli, 1996;Foo et al, 2001;Turnbull et al, 2002). Mutant phenotypes were rescued by grafting with wild-type tissue, even in interstock grafts where small pieces of wild-type stem tissue were grafted between mutant rootstock and shoot tissue (Napoli, 1996;Foo et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%