2012
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pervasive Indels and Their Evolutionary Dynamics after the Fish-Specific Genome Duplication

Abstract: Insertions and deletions (indels) in protein-coding genes are important sources of genetic variation. Their role in creating new proteins may be especially important after gene duplication. However, little is known about how indels affect the divergence of duplicate genes. We here study thousands of duplicate genes in five fish (teleost) species with completely sequenced genomes. The ancestor of these species has been subject to a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD) event that occurred approximately 350 Ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have a lower percentage of repeated sequences (especially DNA transposons) and shorter intronic sequences. This situation would depend both on a high rate of intron and transposon loss and on a higher level of indels (insertions/ deletions) [Imai et al, 2007;Loh et al, 2008;Noleto et al, 2009;Guo et al, 2012].…”
Section: Deuterostomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have a lower percentage of repeated sequences (especially DNA transposons) and shorter intronic sequences. This situation would depend both on a high rate of intron and transposon loss and on a higher level of indels (insertions/ deletions) [Imai et al, 2007;Loh et al, 2008;Noleto et al, 2009;Guo et al, 2012].…”
Section: Deuterostomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both members of a paralogous gene pair have experienced significantly more insertion and deletion events than genes not retained as duplicates. These indels mostly occurred shortly after the duplication event and are predicted to affect protein structure more than amino acid substitutions (Guo et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 By contrast, the fundamental properties governing protein tolerance to indel events 11 are comparatively understudied. Previous efforts in comparative sequence analysis have 12 suggested that indels preferentially occur in disordered and/or loop regions and are less 13 common in regions with secondary structure [11][12][13][14][15]. Furthermore, indel events may be 14 more likely to occur on the protein surface, where residues are more exposed to solvent, 15 rather than in a protein's core [13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous efforts in comparative sequence analysis have 12 suggested that indels preferentially occur in disordered and/or loop regions and are less 13 common in regions with secondary structure [11][12][13][14][15]. Furthermore, indel events may be 14 more likely to occur on the protein surface, where residues are more exposed to solvent, 15 rather than in a protein's core [13,14]. Thus, constraints on indel events appear to 16 mirror those on substitution events, in that amino-acid substitutions are most frequent 17 in unstructured regions and on the protein surface [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%