2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1821304116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomes of skipper butterflies reveal extensive convergence of wing patterns

Abstract: For centuries, biologists have used phenotypes to infer evolution. For decades, a handful of gene markers have given us a glimpse of the genotype to combine with phenotypic traits. Today, we can sequence entire genomes from hundreds of species and gain yet closer scrutiny. To illustrate the power of genomics, we have chosen skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae). The genomes of 250 representative species of skippers reveal rampant inconsistencies between their current classification and a genome-based phylogeny. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
113
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
12
113
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some reports of nuclear microsatellite loci failing to amplify from older museum material (Watts et al ., ; Saarinen & Daniels, ), especially those loci with long allele amplicons (Strange et al ., ; Ugelvig et al ., ). Yet other studies have been very successful in recovering microsatellite markers (Harper et al ., ; Habel et al ., ) or next‐generation sequence data (Heintzman et al ., ; Tin et al ., ; Prosser et al ., ; Sproul & Maddison, ; Li et al ., ) from 19th‐century material. This suggests to us that the difficulty of successfully obtaining nuclear genotypes from historical insect specimens is probably a surmountable methodological challenge, rather than a fundamental feature of this kind of material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some reports of nuclear microsatellite loci failing to amplify from older museum material (Watts et al ., ; Saarinen & Daniels, ), especially those loci with long allele amplicons (Strange et al ., ; Ugelvig et al ., ). Yet other studies have been very successful in recovering microsatellite markers (Harper et al ., ; Habel et al ., ) or next‐generation sequence data (Heintzman et al ., ; Tin et al ., ; Prosser et al ., ; Sproul & Maddison, ; Li et al ., ) from 19th‐century material. This suggests to us that the difficulty of successfully obtaining nuclear genotypes from historical insect specimens is probably a surmountable methodological challenge, rather than a fundamental feature of this kind of material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Table S1 for complete specimen data. A piece of thoracic tissue from fresh specimens, and either the abdomen or a leg from pinned museum specimens were used for DNA extraction and genomic library preparation according to our protocols developed previously [21][22][23][24] . We used mate-pair libraries to assemble a reference genome of Hesperia colorado from a single wild-collected specimen, also accompanied by RNAseq for gene annotation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we replaced the clades for each family in these trees with the trees constructed for each individual butterfly family using python ETE3 module (109) to generate the USC butterfly trees used in this study. These trees were rescaled as previously described (39,110) and the time axis was added to the tree constructed from all nuclear genes based on our published calibration (8) to match the ages of common nodes between the current and previous trees.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis Of Usc Butterfliesmentioning
confidence: 99%