1937
DOI: 10.1063/1.1710273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Theory of Solids. I

Abstract: (Mit 6 Abbildungen) InhaltsiibersiehtEs sollen die Ergebnisse der vorangehenden Arbeit ") verwertet werden bei der Berechnung der Energiebander nach der Zellenmethode von Wigner und Seitzs)') bzw. Slater9)O) und nach dem Variationsverfahren. Im ersten Fall wird der .Kristall in E ementarzellen zerlegt, SO -A u +~V U =~E U .(1) 1) Dissertation, GieSen ; vorgetragen auf dem Deutschen Physikertag Berlin 1962.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

1954
1954
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Seitz 1940) expected in molecular crystals are of two types, in which (i) the electron is free within the crystal, and (ii) the electron is bound to an individual molecule.…”
Section: Ionized States Of Molecular Crystals*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seitz 1940) expected in molecular crystals are of two types, in which (i) the electron is free within the crystal, and (ii) the electron is bound to an individual molecule.…”
Section: Ionized States Of Molecular Crystals*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic theory of solids (Seitz 1940;Fiirth 1944) gives some important evidence on the compression of materials at high pressures. In its simplest form the theory will give only indicative results and cannot be considered as rigorous.…”
Section: Deductions From Atomic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown (Seitz 1940) that for lithium fluoride n=6 so that 0=3, and further it has been determined that 0 increases with increasing atomic weight. It appears that the values obtained for the alkali metals in Tables 2, 3, and 4 are not inconsistent with these results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if one uses the silver ion radius of Pauling, then the molar volumes of molten AgN0 3 , AgCl, and AgBr 8 are all smaller than the close packed volume of the ions involved. Although there is a range of ambiguity for the radius of Ag+, it is clear that the Pauling radius is (unambiguously) impossible in the cases cited, whereas the value of 0.95 A is in reasonable accord with the steric requirements of solid 9 and molten 8 silver salts and with the relative molar volumes of sodium and silver salts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%