Support Systems and Limitations in Therapeutic Abortion Care by the Gynecologist-Obstetrician of Public Hospitals in Peru

Abstract

Objective To identify the barriers to provide to women and adequately train physicians on therapeutic abortions in public hospitals in Peru. Methods Descriptive cross-sectional survey-based study. We invited 400 obstetrics and gynecology specialists from 7 academic public hospitals in Lima and 8 from other regions of Peru. Expert judges validated the survey. Results We collected survey results from 160 participants that met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 63.7% stated that the hospital where they work does not offer abortion training. Most of the participants consider that the position of the Peruvian government regarding therapeutic abortion is indifferent or deficient. The major limitations to provide therapeutic abortions included Peruvian law (53.8%), hospital policies (18.8%), and lack of experts (10.6%). Conclusion Most surveyed physicians supported therapeutic abortions and showed interest in improving their skills. However, not all hospitals offer training and education. The limited knowledge of the physicians regarding the law and institutional policies, as well as fear of ethical, legal, and religious repercussions, were the main barriers for providing abortions.

Percepciones y prácticas con relación al aborto entre proveedores de medicina tradicional en Perú

“…En Perú, la práctica del aborto está penalizada excepto en casos en los que se realice hasta las 22 semanas de gestación por razones terapéuticas, que incluyen para salvar la vida y salud de la mujer gestante (Presidencia de la República del Perú, 1991). Sin embargo, existe la percepción generalizada de que el aborto es completamente ilegal (Matzumura et al, 2022;Palomino et al, 2011); percepción muchas veces guiada por las múltiples barreras que existen para acceder a este servicio (Samon & Bazán, 2022). Además, el aborto es percibido de manera negativa en general por la población.…”