2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions among Pregnant Women in the Field of Music Therapy: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Objective To investigate in the literature the studies on the benefits of music therapy interventions among pregnant women in the prenatal, delivery and postpartum periods. Data Sources The search for articles was carried out in the following electronic databases: VHL, LILACS, SciELO, Portal CAPES, PsycINFO, ERIC, PubMed/Medline, and journals specialized in this field: Revista Brasileira de Musicoterapia (“Brazilian Journal of Music Therapy”) and Voices. Study Selection Descriptors in Portu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neonates in the music group had significantly better performance on range and period showed an improved outcome in their newborns' behaviors during the postnatal period. 48 Consistent with these findings, a previous review 25 found that listening to music (including lullabies, group singing sessions, the classical form of music, or patients' preferred music) during pregnancy helped in relaxation; decreased anxiety, psychosocial stress, depression, and pain; improved mother-child bonding and quality of sleep; and helped in the regulation of physiological parameters such as heart rate and blood pressure. It was also observed that, other than classical music, women listening to their preferred music reduced anxiety levels, and that lullaby music also helped promote maternal-fetal bonding and well-being.…”
Section: Effect On Newborns' Behaviormentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neonates in the music group had significantly better performance on range and period showed an improved outcome in their newborns' behaviors during the postnatal period. 48 Consistent with these findings, a previous review 25 found that listening to music (including lullabies, group singing sessions, the classical form of music, or patients' preferred music) during pregnancy helped in relaxation; decreased anxiety, psychosocial stress, depression, and pain; improved mother-child bonding and quality of sleep; and helped in the regulation of physiological parameters such as heart rate and blood pressure. It was also observed that, other than classical music, women listening to their preferred music reduced anxiety levels, and that lullaby music also helped promote maternal-fetal bonding and well-being.…”
Section: Effect On Newborns' Behaviormentioning
confidence: 68%
“…17,22 Previous systematic reviews showed the effectiveness of various interventions pertaining to listening to music in controlling pain during childbirth; management of depression, stress, or anxiety; management of women with high-risk pregnancies; and emotional bonding with the growing fetus or newborn. 11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] However, there is limited evidence to suggest the effect of listening to music on perinatal anxiety among low-risk pregnant women, their growing fetus, and/or their newborns in terms of their behaviors. Although any type of music may have anti-anxiety effects and provide soothing or relaxation to an individual, the most effective form of music in this regard is classical music.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mothers with moderate and severe levels of nausea and vomiting are more likely to report poor sleep quality compared to those in the mild category (Li et al, 2021). Music therapy treatment positively affects sleep problems in pregnant women (Shimada et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several systematic and narrative reviews on the use of music-based interventions, approaches and practices to support maternal health and mental health including, e.g. McKinney (1990), Terry and Terry (2012), Hollins Martin (2014), Corbijn van Willenswaard et al (2017, Wulff et al (2017), Parmar (2019), Yang et al (2020) and Shimada et al 2021. The purpose of this overview is to provide a broader view of this area than is possible in these more targeted reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%