2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmediastinal Gunshot Wound in a Pregnant Patient with Stable Hemodynamics

Abstract: Transmediastinal gunshot wounds (TGWs) may lead to life-threatening injuries of vital organs such as large vessels, the esophagus, and lungs. Although they are not commonly encountered in pregnant women, additional caution should be given to these patients. Physical examination for the diagnosis and the choice of treatment modality contain controversial points in hemodynamically stable patients, and resuscitation has excessive importance due to physiological changes in pregnancy. We present a hemodynamically s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, 4-8,12-20,23-25,27-36,38-44 few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations