Resultados funcionais do tratamento artroscópico no impacto femoroacetabular em pacientes com mais de 60 anos em comparação com pacientes com 40 anos ou menos

Aguilera-Bohórquez, Bernardo; Brugiatti, Miguel; Coaquira, Ruddy; Cardozo, Orlando; Cantor, Érika

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1708515

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Greater articular chondral damage as a result of aging, means older adults may not experience the same level of improvements as younger patients [10]. Although research examining benefits of FAI surgery in older populations is increasing, the literature base is still limited, and differences in follow‐up times, inclusion of patients with or without osteoarthritic changes and differences in age‐thresholds for older adult definitions (ranging from > 35 to > 70 years), make interpretation of surgical outcome more difficult [1, 15, 17, 24, 26, 30].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High survivorship and excellent 5-year outcomes in patients older than 40 years undergoing arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement

Mullins¹,

Filan²,

Carton

2023

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To assess 5-year clinical outcome, in adults > 40 years of age, following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement compared to a younger, matched, control group. Methods All primary arthroscopies for FAI between 2009 and 2016 were considered (n = 1762). Hips presenting with Tönnis > 1, lateral centre edge angle < 25°, or prior hip surgery were excluded. Younger (< 40 years) and older hips (> 40 years) were matched for gender, Tönnis grade, capsular repair and radiological parameters. Survival (avoidance of total hip replacement {THR}) was compared between the groups. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were also completed at baseline and 5 years to assess changes in functional capacity. Additionally, hip range of motion (ROM) was assessed at baseline and review. The minimal clinically important diference (MCID) was determined and compared between groups. Results Ninety-seven older hips were matched to 97 younger controls (78% male in both groups). The average age of the older group at the time of surgery was 48.0 ± 5.7 years, compared to 26.7 ± 6.0. Six (6.2%) of the older hips and 1 (1%) of younger hips converted to THR (p = 0.043, efect size = 0.74, large). There were statistically signiicant improvements in all PROMs. At follow-up, there were no diferences in PROMs between groups; signiicant improvements in hip ROM were also observed with no diference in ROM between groups at either time point. Similar achievement of MCIDs was observed in both groups. Conclusions Older patients experience a high survivorship rate at 5 years, although this may be lower than younger patients. Where THR is avoided, large clinically signiicant improvements in pain and function are observed. Level of evidence Level IV.

show abstract