2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Comparison between Prelingual and Postlingual Patients

Abstract: Introduction Cochlear implants (CIs) enable objective measures of the neural function in implanted patients through the measurements of the neural response telemetry (NRT) and of the Auditory nerve Recovery Function (REC). These measurements help in programming the speech processor and understanding the auditory system. Objective To compare the NRT and the REC in prelingual and postlingual implanted patients. Methods An observational, descriptive and prospective study was carried out. The N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the relative refractory period was longer in people with longer duration of hearing loss [39,42]. There was no difference in the temporal recovery of the auditory nerve between pre-and postlingual CI users [43].…”
Section: Eni and Recovery Timementioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the relative refractory period was longer in people with longer duration of hearing loss [39,42]. There was no difference in the temporal recovery of the auditory nerve between pre-and postlingual CI users [43].…”
Section: Eni and Recovery Timementioning
confidence: 82%
“…We believe that our patients found it easy to detect the sound and even to recognize it, because they had all post-lingual hearing loss and already wore a CI in one ear or hearing aids. We have previously studied pre-and postlingual differences in programming elsewhere [22]. It was possible to observe with Map 2, level "C" at the NRT threshold, a higher percentage of detection and recognition of Ling sounds when compared to Map 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%