Auditory Speech Perception Development in Relation to Patient's Age with Cochlear Implant

Ciscare, Grace Kelly Seixas; Mantello, Érika Barioni; Fortunato-Queiroz, Carla Aparecida Urzedo; Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo; Reis, Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa

doi:10.1055/s-0036-1584296

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The ratio of females with CRS to males in this study was 1.2:1. This finding was consistent with a study conducted by Ciscare et al in 2017 with similar results, 51,6% for females and 48,4% for males (Ciscare, et al, 2017). The different results were obtained by other research, male mostly found than female with ratio 1,2:1 (Paramita&Purnami, 2020) This study showed that the most of CRS patients were detected at the age of less than 12 month with an average age at identification of 6.2 month.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Cochlear implants evaluation for congenital rubella syndrome patients in Dr. Soetomo Academic Medical Center

Octaviani

Ekorini

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) is an infection caused by rubella virus that transmitted to the fetus during pregnancy which can cause congenital hearing loss. Cochlear implant is an effective therapy in children with severe to profound bilateral hearing loss. Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) method is a receptive scale assessment of auditory stimulation that can be applied to all children regardless of age, before and after cochlear implant. Evaluating the results of cochlear implants using CAP-II in patients with CRS. A retrospective descriptive study were conducted to samples taken from medical records of CRS patients who had cochlear implants in 2011-2018 at ORL-HNS department of Dr. Soetomo Academic Medical Center. Evaluation of CAP-II results was performed 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after cochlear implant. Eleven CRS patient who underwent cochlear implant during 2011-2018. Six months after cochlear implant showed the highest scale was 6. At 12-months evaluation showed the highest scale was 7, while at 24-months evaluation showed the highest scale was 8. Cochlear implants provide good auditory performance based on CAP-II scale in sensorineural hearing loss of CRS patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Cochlear implants evaluation for congenital rubella syndrome patients in Dr. Soetomo Academic Medical Center

Octaviani

Ekorini

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Age at implant, duration of HL, and experience with hearing aids have already been identified as factors affecting speech recognition in postlingually deafened adults (Kim et al, 2018). The longer the duration of deafness, the poorer the outcomes with CI (e.g., Ciscare et al, 2017;Stropahl et al, 2017;James et al, 2019). Brüggemann et al (2017) noted a positive correlation between duration of deafness and self-reported hearing quality (using the Oldenburg Index) and Kim et al (2018) observed a significant negative effect on word recognition scores at >10 years of deafness.…”

Section: Benefits Of Cochlear Implantation For the Listening Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Listening Network and Cochlear Implant Benefits in Hearing-Impaired Adults

James

Reinoso

Breuning

et al. 2021

Front. Aging Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Older adults with mild or no hearing loss make more errors and expend more effort listening to speech. Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing to deaf patients but with limited fidelity. We hypothesized that patient-reported hearing and health-related quality of life in CI patients may similarly vary according to age. Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) of hearing scale and Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI) questionnaires were administered to 543 unilaterally implanted adults across Europe, South Africa, and South America. Data were acquired before surgery and at 1, 2, and 3 years post-surgery. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models with visit, age group (18–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and 65+), and side of implant as main factors and adjusted for other covariates. Tinnitus and dizziness prevalence did not vary with age, but older groups had more preoperative hearing. Preoperatively and postoperatively, SSQ scores were significantly higher (Δ0.75–0.82) for those aged <45 compared with those 55+. However, gains in SSQ scores were equivalent across age groups, although postoperative SSQ scores were higher in right-ear implanted subjects. All age groups benefited equally in terms of HUI gain (0.18), with no decrease in scores with age. Overall, younger adults appeared to cope better with a degraded hearing before and after CI, leading to better subjective hearing performance.

show abstract

“…This result shows that in patients with prelingual deafness due to genetic causes, younger patients may expect a better CI result than older patients [Miyagawa et al, 2016]. One of the benefits of early cochlear implant application is to minimize the gap between the age of language development and chronological age and to learn hearing information during sensitive hearing and language development periods [Ciscare et al, 2017]. Postoperative follow-up period is as important as preoperative period.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

A New Pathogenic Variant in the TRIOBP Associated with Profound Deafness Is Remediable with Cochlear Implantation

Tekın

Ceulaer²,

Govaerts³

et al. 2020

Audiol Neurotol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: A rare type of nonsyndromic autosomal recessive hereditary hearing loss is caused by pathogenic mutations in the TRIOBP gene mostly involving exons 6 and 7. These mutations cause hearing loss originating from dysfunction of sensory inner ear hair cells. Of all the affected siblings, 2 brothers and 1 sister, part of an Afghan family, were referred to our clinic for diagnostic workup and candidacy selection for cochlear implantation (CI). Methods: Molecular analysis showed a homozygous c.1342C > T p. (Arg448*) pathogenic variant in exon 7 of the TRIOBP gene (reference sequence NM_001039141.2) in all 3 affected siblings. Clinical audiometry demonstrated profound sensorineural hearing loss in all 3 affected siblings (2 males and 1 female), and they were implanted unilaterally. Results: One month after activation, the pure-tone averages with the CI processor were between 30 and 23 dBHL. Ten months after the first activation of the implant, open-set speech audiometry test could be performed for the first time in the 2 younger CI recipients (S5 and S9), and they could identify up to a maximum 77% phonemes correctly. The oldest brother (S12) could not yet perform open-set speech audiometry at that moment. Conclusions: Implant outcomes are better with normal inner ear anatomy in general. The earlier congenital patients are implanted, the better their outcomes. Here, we demonstrate both statements are true in a homozygous c.1342C > T p. (Arg448*) pathogenic variant in the TRIOBP gene in all 3 affected siblings.

show abstract

Auditory Speech Perception Development in Relation to Patient's Age with Cochlear Implant

Cited by 9 publications

References 28 publications

Cochlear implants evaluation for congenital rubella syndrome patients in Dr. Soetomo Academic Medical Center

Cochlear implants evaluation for congenital rubella syndrome patients in Dr. Soetomo Academic Medical Center

The Listening Network and Cochlear Implant Benefits in Hearing-Impaired Adults

A New Pathogenic Variant in the TRIOBP Associated with Profound Deafness Is Remediable with Cochlear Implantation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About