2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1578807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retroauricular Endoscope-Assisted Approach to the Neck: Early Experience in Latin America

Abstract: Introduction There has been a significant increase in concern towards improving aesthetic and functional outcomes without compromising the oncologic effectiveness in head and neck surgery. In this subset, endoscope-assisted and robotic procedures allowed the development of new approaches to the neck, including the retroauricular access, which is now routinely used, especially in Korea. Objectives This study aims to provide a descriptive analysis of our initial experience with retroauricular endoscope-assisted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these access routes cannot be literally defined as "minimally invasive", they are not burdened by the impact of the scar, which is virtually invisible and not a decisive factor in the main sequelae of the standard cervical approach; they can therefore be equated as outcomes with currently minimally invasive interventions, referring to them as "remote access" interventions. Concerning endoscopic-assisted neck dissection, several drawbacks have been highlighted by many studies [14][15][16][17] . These limitations include a reduced range of motion, with various collisions between first surgeon and assistant, a two-dimensional view with a lack of depth perception, impaired eye-hand coordination, minimal tactile sensation, and a relatively slow learning curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these access routes cannot be literally defined as "minimally invasive", they are not burdened by the impact of the scar, which is virtually invisible and not a decisive factor in the main sequelae of the standard cervical approach; they can therefore be equated as outcomes with currently minimally invasive interventions, referring to them as "remote access" interventions. Concerning endoscopic-assisted neck dissection, several drawbacks have been highlighted by many studies [14][15][16][17] . These limitations include a reduced range of motion, with various collisions between first surgeon and assistant, a two-dimensional view with a lack of depth perception, impaired eye-hand coordination, minimal tactile sensation, and a relatively slow learning curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final histopathological examinations confirmed the preoperative diagnosis and oncologic safety margins were free of tumor in all cases of tumors. Lira et al reported PA as first indication (3/8), followed by sialadenitis (2/8), and confirmed the use of this approach in one case of malignant tumor diagnosed as cribiform ACC 23 . Neves et al reported also PA as first indication (53%), followed by sialadenitis (31%), and confirmed the use of this approach in 4 cases of malignant tumors (16%), especially 1 case of ACC, 2 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and 1 case of oncocytic carcinoma, which were all resected with free oncologic safety margins 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…12 In contrast, Neves et al reported male predominance (61%) among 23 cases of endoscope-assisted retroauricular approach for SMG resection, with a mean age of 44.1 years; 11 Lira et al reported no sex predominance among 8 cases of endoscopic SMG excision via retro-auricular hairline incision. 23 Endoscopic SMG excision through hairline approach offers several advantages, including its feasibility, the reduced tissue damage, improved cosmetics as scar is hidden by the auricle and hair; lower risk of perioperative complications such as bleeding, infection, and temporary or permanent nerves (marginal mandibular, lingual, or hypoglossal) damages; more rapid wound healing and early recovery; and less postoperative pain. 3,4,6,8,9,11,12,19,21,23 The magnification of the surgical field, which allows good visualization and illumination of the anatomical landmark and structures is one of the great advantages of endoscopic surgery as it facilitates careful dissection of these anatomic structures, making the procedure very safe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations