2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70471-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival from rare cancer in adults: a population-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
90
0
19

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
90
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of vague clinical presentation sometimes and low awareness among physicians, data in the literature on the real incidence of NETs are probably underestimates. Data comparisons in relation to the site of tumour origin are difficult to obtain because of the overall rarity of these neoplasms and their incomplete recognition and documentation in various national cancer registries (Gatta et al 2006) and because of their variable and sometimes imprecise classification (Kloppel et al 2009, Klimstra et al 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of vague clinical presentation sometimes and low awareness among physicians, data in the literature on the real incidence of NETs are probably underestimates. Data comparisons in relation to the site of tumour origin are difficult to obtain because of the overall rarity of these neoplasms and their incomplete recognition and documentation in various national cancer registries (Gatta et al 2006) and because of their variable and sometimes imprecise classification (Kloppel et al 2009, Klimstra et al 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies evidenced that epigenetic alterations may play a role in the development and progression of SGT (32)(33)(34)(35). However, a relatively limited variety of SGT histotypes and genes analyzed for epigenetic regulation has been examined (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to uncertainty about the applicability of the results of studies to elderly patients in terms of both the efficacy and toxicity of treatments. In MPM, older age has been generally considered a negative prognostic factor (Herndon et al, 1998;Gatta et al, 2006). Apart from age-related biological differences, this may also have been influenced by a nihilistic attitude to treatment of this disease (Treasure and Sedrakyan, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%