2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ligamentous reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in the treatment of instability of the distal radioulnar joint

Abstract: ObjectivesTo measure the quality of life and clinical outcomes of patients treated with interosseous membrane (IOM) ligament reconstruction of the forearm, using the brachioradialis (BR), and describe a new surgical technique for the treatment of joint instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).MethodsFrom January 2013 to September 2016, 24 patients with longitudinal injury of the distal radioulnar joint DRUJ were submitted to surgical treatment with a reconstruction procedure of the distal portion of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While successful surgical treatments to confer DRUJ stability were well-documented, most of these treatments comprised either prolong immobilization or intrinsic TFCC repair or extrinsic ligament reconstruction following internal xation of DRF (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), which may result in joint stiffness and delayed functional recovery for prolong immobilization, and the steep learning curve of repair or reconstruction of soft-tissue stabilizers for the DRUJ may hinder the application of these treatments to the setting of acute injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While successful surgical treatments to confer DRUJ stability were well-documented, most of these treatments comprised either prolong immobilization or intrinsic TFCC repair or extrinsic ligament reconstruction following internal xation of DRF (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), which may result in joint stiffness and delayed functional recovery for prolong immobilization, and the steep learning curve of repair or reconstruction of soft-tissue stabilizers for the DRUJ may hinder the application of these treatments to the setting of acute injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, reconstruction of the richly innervated DOB with tendon grafts (Riggenbach et al ) may not address the sensory function of that IOM bundle (Kim et al ), and consequently fails to account for the dynamic aspects of DRUJ stability. Alternatively, the DOB could be reconstructed with brachioradialis distal tendon rerouting (Aita et al ) or bone‐patella tendon‐bone interposition. A histological study has shown that the patellar tendon contains sensory nerve endings (Cabuk & Kusku‐Cabuk, ); however, the bone‐patellar tendon‐bone graft has been only performed for reconstruction of the CB (Marcotte & Osterman, ; Gaspar et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the level of the wrist, a transfer of the brachioradialis was performed according to the technique described by Aita et al, 14 modified by us (►Fig. 2).…”
Section: Clinical Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle: the Apergis technique with: transfer of the brachioradialis tendon detached from its distal insertion and re-attached to the ulna at the junction of middle and lower thirds using an interference screw; reinsertion of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). Right: the modified technique by Aita et al14 with transfer of the brachioradialis tendon severed from its proximal muscular attach then reattached to the neck of the ulna and fixed by an anchor. The red geometric figure represents the bulk of the muscle body of the brachioradialis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%